Showing posts with label Book Review Article. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Book Review Article. Show all posts

Monday, October 13, 2025

Book Review Article, László Krasznahorkai, "Herscht 07769 (Florian Herscht’s Bach Novel)"

 



László Krasznahorkai, Herscht 07769 (Florian Herscht’s Bach Novel), translated from the Hungarian by Ottilie Mulzet, New Directions, 2024, 406 pp. (originally published in Budapest, 2021)

[Note: On October 9, 2025, László Krasznahorkai was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. In honor of that award I repost here my earlier review, in slightly revised form, of his latest novel.]

 

Introduction

Here is a pertinent citation from Dennis Overbye (NY Times, 12/22/2024): “Everything that scientists have learned tells us that the universe is dynamic, and so is our knowledge of it. Nothing lasts forever, not even forever itself. Stars are born and they die, their ashes congeal in new generations of flash and crash. And so the show goes, until the last, biggest black hole gasps its last puff of subatomic vapor into the void.

“We don’t know what wonders await discovery back in the first nanosecond of time or in the yawning eons yet ahead. We don’t know why there is something instead of nothing at all. Or why God plays dice, as Einstein put it as he mulled the randomness implicit in quantum mechanics, the house rules of the subatomic realm.”

Herscht 07769—coming late in the career of the world-renowned, now Nobel Laureate Krasznahorkai—treats the approaching End of the World. The novel features a worldwide malaise that descends upon the earth in the year 2017 or thereabouts. Or, more likely, the malaise has always been around, but we humans often prefer to ignore the starkest truths. Lately, however, the state of the universe has been expressing itself in ever more peremptory tones: look at me! The setting of the novel is Thuringia, East Germany, and the action describes how everyday denizens of a small town react to what craziness the universe has been up to.  

In the town of Kana, East Germany, lives our hero, Florian Herscht, a naïve young man—gigantic in size and muscle power but gentle in nature. As the novel opens, Florian, who appears to be somewhere on the autism spectrum, has begun mulling over that same randomness implicit in quantum mechanics. Terrified by the implications that physics presents, he sees a horrible calamity in the offing, “a staggering presence, in his view, threatening the existence of the country, indeed all of humanity.” Florian is writing his first letter to Angela Merkel, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany. He reasons that not only is she percipient and politically savvy, but she also has been trained as a physicist. She can deal with the crisis that physics has got humanity all tangled up in, and can bring the issue to the attention of the Security Council at the United Nations.

The title of the novel, Herscht 07769 is taken from the return address (last name and postal code) that Florian puts on his envelopes. Only on p. 327 do we learn his full address: Ernst-Thälmann-Strasse 38, 07769 Kana. A check on the internet reveals that the street is named after the German politician and leader of the Communist Party of Germany from 1925 to 1933. Arrested by the Gestapo, Thälmann was held in solitary confinement for eleven years. On the personal orders of Hitler he was executed (shot) at Buchenwald in 1944.

Part of the developing plot involves Florian’s continuous writing of letters to Merkel, to which, of course, he receives no reply. Early on in the novel he undertakes a trip to Berlin, hoping to meet the Chancellor in person, but this ends in frustration. Time moves fast in this book. By p. 30 a year has passed since Florian sent his first letter to Angela Merkel, and by p. 161 it has been almost two years. Soon the narrative will be enveloped in 2020, the Covid year.

At one point the naïve Florian thinks that Merkel might come to him in Kana, arriving by train. He makes a sign with her name on it, goes to meet the trains arriving from Jena, holds up his sign as the passengers disembark. But Angela is never among them. This gives rise to a good deal of mirth amongst the citizens of Kana, almost all of whom love the gullible and childlike Florian.

An orphan attending a vocational school in a different town, preparing for a career as a baker, Florian is initially brought to Kana by a man described only as “the Boss.” This man becomes a kind of overbearing father figure to him, commanding his every movement and employing him in his own business, which involves the cleaning of graffiti from buildings. The name of his company, ALLES WIRD REIN (All Will Be Clean), is a phrase that—expanded from its literal meaning—has sinister implications: ethnic cleansing. For the Jew-hating Boss is also the leader of a local neo-Nazi cell, and a major theme of the novel treats the rise of right-wing politics in what was once a separate country, East Germany.

A Novel Firmly Based on German Realities

Herscht 07769 is a German novel, set in Germany and populated entirely by German characters. Here we have the rather unusual situation in which a writer from a different country and working in a different language (Hungarian) convincingly and cogently presents personages and scenes from a foreign setting. I can only presume that Krasznahorkai (hereinafter abbreviated L.K.) spent considerable time researching his book in Thuringia. I also presume that he speaks German well. The book is peppered with German words and place names. Sometimes the translator leaves the original German word, which, I suppose, is what L.K. did in his Hungarian original. Examples: Pfarramt (the word for a parish office), Schloss (palace), Rosengarten (rose garden). The names of characters are sometimes actual German words, e.g., Pförtner (porter, who, by way of a joke, works as an actual porter, or gatekeeper, at the Porcelain Factory).

The book is rife with facts relevant to the life of a German citizen. Just one example, of many: Florian, along with lots of other citizens of Kana, receives welfare checks known as “the Hartz IV benefits.” Everything about the specifics of Florian’s journey to Berlin is related in detail. He waits beside the dilapidated train station in Kana for more than an hour “before the arrival of the earliest possible train from Orlamūnde.” While waiting he is “worried he would end up missing the connection at Jena-Göschwitz or in Halle.” These appear to be real connections in real places. L.K. as a writer of fiction, of course, has the option of making up his facts, but throughout this novel he anchors everything in reality. He does, of course, present fictional characters, but I would not be surprised to learn that many of them have prototypes in the town where he researched his book. He has teased interviewers by suggesting that his main character, Florian Herscht, really exists.

There is no town named Kana, described in the novel as “nineteen miles from Jena,” but there is the town of Kahla, which seems to fit almost exactly into the geography of the book. Look online, where you will see Kahla described as located “on the river Saale, fourteen kilometers south of Jena.” Many geographical features described in the book as associated with Kana are, in fact, typical of Kahla. E.g. (1) The Saale; one of Florian’s favorite places is on a bench, where he can watch the Saale River flow by. This is where he ends up sitting in his final appearance in the book. (2) The Dohlenstein, a mountain on the right bank of the Saale River; and the Leuchtenburg Castle that towers above it. I repeat, apart from Kana, all other place names in the novel appear to be real, and I suspect that all the names of the streets in Kana are actual names of streets in Kahla. I checked online for Ernst-Thälmann-Strasse, the street where Florian lives in Kana, and, sure enough, there is such a street in Kahla; its postal code, 07768, is off one numeral from Florian’s.

Neo-Nazis in Thuringia

Apparently much chagrined by the proliferation of right-wing politics throughout Europe—in his home country of Hungary as well—L.K. makes the presence of Nazis a major theme. In fact, much of the novel’s action revolves around the activities of the neo-Nazi cell led by “the Boss” in Kana. These days, for the first time since WWII, a far-right party, Alternative fūr Deutschland, has been garnering electoral support, not only in Thuringia, but also in other parts of what was once East Germany, such as Saxony. Never mentioned by name in L.K.’s novel, the AfD party has come out vehemently opposed to Merkel’s opening of the borders (in 2015) to a million refugees from Syria, Afghanistan, and other nations. The party’s popular chairman in Thuringia, Björn Höcke, has publicly denigrated the Holocaust memorial in Berlin, calling Germans “the only people in the world who stuck up a monument of shame in the heart of their capital.” This white-nationalist party calls for the “remigration” of refugees, especially Muslims, supports the policies of Putin in Russia, and at times has embraced antisemitism. Our disgraceful/despicable new American Vice President, Vance, has recently come out in support of this party.

At various points in his novel L.K. alludes to the activities of far-right groups in Thuringia. He mentions “how the Thuringia Heimatschutz came to an end, what happened in Leuchtenburg and the Timo [sic, should be Tino] Brandt case, what happened to the Hate-brothers, or Wolfleben or Madley.” Tino Brandt, a neo-Nazi from Thuringia, became, at age nineteen, an informant for Germany’s domestic intelligence service. From 1994 to 2001 he went on working as informant but used the money he was paid to support neo-Nazi groups. L.K. skips over details of one of the most notorious of scandals in Thuringia, that of the National Socialist Underground murders—the Heimatschutz alluded to above. From 2000 to 2007 two young men and one young woman went on a crime spree, murdering eight ethnic Turks and one Greek. I take much of my information above from a book review by Joshua Hammer: “Making Germany Hate Again,” in NYRB, Dec. 19, 2024.

The Bach theme in the novel appears early on, when the Bachhaus, a museum in Eisenach, is desecrated by graffiti: the painting of a wolf head and the word WE. The Boss is called to clean up the graffiti, and he takes with him his assistant Florian to do the job. Here we learn a rather improbable fact about the Boss: he is a lover of classical music, at least of Bach, whom he considers “an empyrean presence sent from heaven, a prophet, a saint who . . . inscribed into every single note the essence of the German spirit.” Even more improbably, the Boss has founded a symphony orchestra in Kana, made up largely of amateur musicians, and he is its unofficial conductor, rehearsing the group every Saturday. He forces this cowed group to play Bach’s music, but they never get it right. First violinist is Herr Feldmann, retired German and Latin teacher, who would really prefer playing pop music, as would most of the other members of the orchestra. When he learns of Florian’s obsession with quantum physics, the Boss slaps him around a bit (an everyday occurrence) and tells him that “a real Thuringian German gets involved with Bach and not with the universe.” Later in the book Florian will, indeed, get involved with Bach.

Among Jewish characters in the book are Herr Feldmann, Herr Ringer, and Herr Köhler. Ringer is a formidable presence, who fulminates against the Nazis in Thuringia and in his home town of Kana. The Boss fears him and has plans to blow up his auto repair shop at some convenient time in the future. Ringer blames the Nazis—and, in particular, the Boss—for the graffiti attacks on Bach memorial sites. This is ironic, in light of the fact that the Boss is incensed over the attacks, getting all the members of his cell involved in efforts to catch the perpetrators. We do not learn much else about the activities of the neo-Nazi cell, at least not until they attack a local gas station and kill the husband and wife team from Brazil who work there (Rosario and Nadir). This comes after one of the Nazis, Jūrgen, attempts to rape the beautiful Nadir and is beaten up and detained by her husband. In an act of revenge for Jürgen, who is arrested, the neo-Nazis blow up the station. Later we are presented with a chilling scene, in which the only woman neo-Nazi, Karin, recalls how her cell members once beat and tortured six children whom they suspected of spray-painting graffiti. This is the only explicit example in the book of the group’s brutality. The children, so it turns out, were innocent.

Small Town Living

The most impressive thing about L.K.’s novel is his ability to take us into a small town in Germany and show us the ordinary people living there. The book has a multitude of characters, all German, and they pop up sometimes in a paragraph that started out devoted to someone or something entirely different. Some are left undeveloped, but a good many others take on more and more flesh as they work their way through the book—ending up as rounded, extremely well-delineated, believable personages.

The first of these townspeople introduced are Jessica and her husband Herr Volkenant, who run the local post office. They post Florian’s letters to Angela Merkel, but advise him against writing them. Everyone else in Kana—practically all of whom know and like the man-child Florian—has the same advice for him. Midway through the novel (p. 210-11), when Florian brings one more of his letters to the P.O., we have one of L.K.’s long looping sentences describing the Volkenants at work:

“he stood in front of the post office right at opening time, and he was fairly anxious as to whether Jessica would have the right size of envelope for his letter, but there was no point in being nervous because Jessica did have it, we have everything here, she smiled at him proudly, and once again when Florian handed her the envelope, she didn’t look at the address but only tossed it onto the scale and said, one euro and fifty cents, then she took the euro and fifty cents and said: it’s good to see you again, and already she was calling the next person to the counter, because just then there were a lot of people, the door could hardly be closed even though it was already fairly cold outside, too cold for the door to stay open, so the line snaked off to the left, Volkenant also came out to organize the queue, because this is a post office, please don’t stand around in one big jumble, he said, stand a little closer together and right behind one another, well, that’s it now, he praised the waiting people who obediently formed a neater line, and he went back to his office while Jessica continued to diligently stamp letters, she counted change and issued receipts and took money or credit cards, I don’t know what came over them, she looked at her husband uncomprehendingly when they were finally able to put out the lunch break sign, and they went up to their apartment for lunch, no holiday, nothing, and they start trooping in here like an army, I’m telling you this seriously—she took a sandwich from the paper bag and gave it to her husband, because they always had their sandwiches delivered for lunch . . . old auntie Ingrid brought the sandwiches and the coffee for them, auntie Ingrid who lived not too far away on Margarethenstrasse near the Demokratieladen; [translates as “democracy shop,” whatever that is; note the full stop here, by way of a semicolon, URB] once, when the post office was being relocated to a new building, and overhearing the Volkenants talking about how short their lunch break was, auntie Ingrid had suggested, namely, she stepped forward with the idea, that since she had nothing to do and was bored to death, she’d be more than happy to bring whatever they wanted for lunch from the Hubert Bakery downstairs, and that’s what happened, they all approved the idea, and ever since then auntie Ingrid was like a clock to them, because, as Jessica put it, auntie Ingrid was always on time, the clock didn’t strike noon above their heads, but instead auntie Ingrid set the clock moving every noon, because she was the one who, exactly at twelve noon, pressed down the door handle of the post office, at first carefully unpacking the two plastic cups of coffee, then putting the plastic bag on the counter, and taking out the two sandwiches, and all she would say was Mahlzeit [enjoy your meal], and then she was gone, because she knew there was no time for chitchat, although that realization filled her with regret, because she could talk about something every day, there was always something going on she wished to converse about, and, well, she couldn’t always be bothering Frau Ringer in the library, although it would have been good to talk to her, especially now with these explosions on her mind just like they were on everyone’s, because that’s all you hear about nowadays, she told Frau Ringer, when she had her library day, you hear about this and that, about how they [the neo-Nazis] have their nest here in Kana, and all of our Thuringia is full of potential terrists, she always said ‘potential terrists,’ and no one ever corrected her, everyone always let auntie Ingrid say whatever she had to say, for everyone knew how hard the solitude was for her to bear, my husband died, she would swoop down on this or that unsuspecting tourist when they asked her for directions, the poor thing has been gone for seventeen years now, ever since then I’ve been on my own, and with these legs of mine” . . .  etc., etc., etc.

I cite this passage at length as a typical example of L.K.’s narrative method, by way of which characters take on their fleshed-out existence and become real to us. So real that we feel for them when fate steps in—as so happens with the Volkenants and the Ringers, and many others late in the book—to devastate their carefully cultivated, ordinary, smalltown life. For L.K. emphasizes again and again that nearly all the denizens of the town of Kana want nothing more than to live out uneventful lives in calm and contentment, but life’s path is riddled with huge pits, into which we fall.

Such as well are Ilona and her husband, who run a buffet, the Grillhäusel, “Ilona was a saint in the eyes of the regulars, as soon as she spoke her wish was fulfilled, Ilona was the star here, Hoffmann frequently said it good and loud so that the person he was speaking about would also hear him, even if the electricity were shut off, we’d still be able to see in her shining light, at which everyone raised their glasses and they drank to her, they drank to Ilona, they drank to this island of peace that was truly the only light in their lives, and although they referred to Ilona as their queen, who of course did not think that way at all, she was aware her customers loved the Grillhäusel, but it was enough for her to know that her customers were satisfied, that was her goal, the business went on, it didn’t bring in a lot, but it was enough to survive in this great unemployment when she had arrived here all the way from Transylvania to get married; . . .” Late in the book L.K. disposes of Ilona and her husband in an almost offhand manner, not even devoting a separate scene to their murder by the Nazi Karin. Our Krasznahorkai is not one to coddle his characters.

First introduced as a nice librarian who is kind to Florian, Frau Ringer is another character who is developed throughout the whole 400 pages of the book. She and her husband are featured in an episode when, while out picnicking at Leuchtenburg Castle, they are attacked by a wolf, thereby throwing the whole town into a frenzy. From this point on things go downhill for both of the Ringers, who deserve a better fate than the one they are handed near the end of the action. Immediately following this wolf attack comes more dire news to rattle the already frazzled nerves of Kana: the Covid pandemic of 2020. The leitmotif of the wolf—the return of wild wolves to Germany after 150 years of near extinction—runs throughout the novel.

Auntie Ingrid, the lonely old lady who helps out the Volkenants with their lunch, stops strangers and locals on the street—including the ever kind and gentle Florian—to tell them her troubles. She makes her first appearance on p. 65. There she is depicted in a discussion with Frau Ringer at the library, on the topic of pork chops with potatoes, topped off by a special brown sauce, much favored by Herr Ringer. Then she, auntie Ingrid, does not show up again until the passage I’ve just cited (p. 210-12). Later on she is shown as blissfully ignorant of the anxiety pervading the town, over the Covid pandemic, over the rumors about wolf attacks, mysterious explosions, over the desecration of Bach sites by graffiti, and the activities of the local Nazis. For lack of anything else to do, auntie Ingrid decides to start a movement in Kana, to see who can grow the best chrysanthemums: The Auntie Ingrid Chrysanthemum Competition.

Then, a hundred pages on into the novel, she shows up for the last time, discussing with the Volkenants the impending retirement of Chancellor Merkel. In her opinion, given how hard she has worked for the Germans, Angela Merkel deserves some peaceful years, and auntie Ingrid “held her hands apart.” This gesture of weary relinquishment—the spreading of one’s hands palms upward—appears over and over throughout Herscht 07769, as if all of the characters were constantly repeating, “Well, what are you going to do?” One page after expressing her sympathy for the retiring Merkel, auntie Ingrid goes home, sits down in her favorite rocking chair, dozes off, and rocks herself off into the next world. We the readers love her by this point, feel for her, and are sorry to see her go.

Another central character is the above-mentioned Adrian Köhler, a local man much respected by his fellow residents of Kana. Now in retirement from his job as teacher of physics, he runs his own amateur weather station. He also offers an evening class on quantum physics in an adult education program. He befriends the main character Florian, who has attended his night class repeatedly. Köhler tries to assure him that particle physics does not guarantee—as Florian has surmised—the approaching end on all life on earth. The subplot revolving around A.K. also includes a friend of his, Dr. Tietz, a psychiatrist who lives in the neighboring town of Eisenberg. At one point A.K. suddenly disappears from his home, only to reappear much later in the book.

Two neighbors of Köhler, Frau Burgmūller and Frau Schneider are ladies who spend most of their time “peeking out the window to see if something was going on out there.” They compete with one another to establish who is privy to the best local gossip and provide a comic backstory to all the action. They take great interest in the disappearance of their neighbor, and rejoice in his return. But when A.K. begins going senile, his friend Tietz takes him in, moves him to Eisenberg, and the two fraus are nonplussed at this turn of events. Like most of the other townspeople who love placid Florian, these two turn against him in the second half of the book, when he becomes a fugitive from justice. Frau Burgmūller informs detectives from Erfurt that Florian is a shady character and a disgrace to Kana.

A plethora of characters populate the pages of the novel, and the author has a special facility for describing smalltown people and life. Sometimes it appears that he has an encyclopedic knowledge of this town in Thuringia, throwing in details that only local residents could know. The neo-Nazi sect led by the Boss is depicted repeatedly drinking beer together. At one point they brag on how many different beer brands are brewed in Thuringia (409), and L.K. provides the brand names of the most popular beers. Multitudes of details about the characters help bring them alive. Herr Köhler loves tomatoes on the vine. Jessica and her husband Volkenant get along well, but she can’t stand the way he throws his dirty socks all over the place. We are frequently treated to long descriptions of what people like to eat. Here is Dr. Tietz, puzzled and perplexed over the disappearance of his best friend Köhler:

“I’m not hungry, the doctor pushed the plate away, listless, even though it was his favorite meal, fried pork liver with potatoes, parsley, and beetroot, he really liked this, although he kept this a secret from his guests, because then the first course was always Zwiebeltiegel or something like that, as the season permitted, then for the main course there would be Tote Oma or Frikadellen, that kind of thing, or, if they were receiving more distinguished guests, such as the pharmacist from Erfurt or the head psychiatrist of the Helios Clinic, then they served oysters, shrimp cocktail, or flounder roasted with vegetables, but never pork liver, only he could get that, and only when it was the two of them alone, and this, too, was infrequent because his wife looked after his health and allowed him to have pork liver once every two weeks, sometimes once every three weeks, but no more than that: there was a meat day, followed by three fish days, then a pasta day, well, and then sometimes his favorite, fried pork liver garnished with a bit of ground pepper, or—his secret favorite—boiled knuckle of pork with a glass of beer, well, this he got really only very infrequently, maybe once every two months, because his wife said: at your age, a person needs to look after his health, and since you’re not willing to do so, I’ll tell you what to eat and when, because if it were up to you, you’d eat meat every day and more meat, and maybe some liver too, and it doesn’t work that way, my dear—unfortunately, the doctor added to himself—however, his wife continued, . . .” [here we grade off into more discussion about what could have happened to their friend Adrian (Köhler); this continues for half a page more, but then we’re back into the issue of the edibles]:

“but he had no appetite, the police interrogation in his office had set his nerves on edge so much, but still liver was liver, and the fragrance of the freshly ground pepper overcame the doctor’s resistance while his wife just kept on talking, because she kept on going on about Adrian this and Adrian that, and Adrian would show up . . . and he, Dr. Tietz, should calm down already, and eat his lunch properly while the doctor gulped down one bite after the other, the meal was tasting better and better, so that at the end he asked for a small second helping, and his wife, in view of the extraordinary circumstances, gave him a second helping, because the food would get cold if he didn’t eat it, she had eaten her fill, so she gave him everything left in the pot, and [note the abrupt transition to a completely different character in the same sentence, typical of the style of the whole narrative, URB] otherwise the Boss too was very fond of pork liver, even if he cooked pork liver very rarely himself, he usually pan-fried it, or course for that you had to get up early, because those louse-ridden hags [now we get the Boss’s words, not, however, in quotations, since L.K. eschews quotation marks] were already standing there when the shop opened, he growled at Florian sometimes, standing around in front of the Netto even before it opened so they could pounce on the fresh pork liver, because it was cheap, so that he had to talk to someone in deliveries, if pork liver comes in, set aside two packages for me; you just call me, Boss, and you stop by for them anytime, the unloader winked at him, usually this happened on Fridays . . .” etc., etc., etc.

“If you’re a reader perhaps not interested in what a minor character likes to eat, I’ll tell you anyway”—so the author L.K. seems to be saying—“and I’ll make it interesting. Or maybe you’ll be at least interested in the fact that one of my main characters, the Boss, likes to eat the same thing as Dr. Tietz, although he has to go to a bit of trouble to purchase that same thing and he cooks it mostly in different ways.”

Other central characters are Herr Feldmann and his wife, the deputy superintendent at the Hochhaus, where Florian lives (described only as the Deputy), a local forest ranger who sells honey on the side, Frau Hopf, who runs a small eatery with her husband, Hoffmann, the main jokester who hangs out in the IKS pub and at the Grillhäusel, and many, many more. New characters slide into the narrative unobtrusively in the middle of a sentence; then the author develops them in further appearances throughout the book, until at the end we have a multitude of highly rounded personages.

In his novel The Melancholy of Resistance—a thoroughly misanthropic book written thirty-six years earlier—L.K.’s hatred and contempt for the Hungarian bourgeoisie is, to say the least, intense. But here he treats most of his German characters with gentle irony, mocking their petty-bourgeois ways. He seems on the whole to feel affection for his personages; he does, however, kill them off without mercy (see above, Ilona). Four of the main characters die suddenly near the end of the story: Herr Ringer (suicide by hanging), Herr Feldmann and the Deputy (brain hemorrhages), and Jessica (traffic accident).

Sometimes it seems as if L.K. just can’t get enough of sticking in new characters, even if he has to leave them undeveloped. Such a man is Torsten, the school janitor, who steps into the action only a time or two. Then there’s the dentist, Dr. Henneberg, who does not find purchase in the novel until p. 375. So that the author simply does not have enough time and space left to get him developed; we learn only that he hates his job, “this goddamned life with these pliers and drills and excavators and spatulas and root lifters and scissors, to hell with all that, sometimes it burst out of him . . .”

May Day in Kana, and the Lugubrious Schlagbaum

Krasznahorkai has a facility for describing lovely little set scenes, lyrical in nature, which reveal still more about how it feels to live in a small German town. One of these depicts “the renowned May Day celebrations in Kana,” always held in the Rosengarten. This year they are observed in a somewhat subdued way, given Kana’s troubles with wolf attacks, the new pandemic, neo-Nazis, explosions, even murders. The second half of the book shows Kana, and apparently the rest of Germany, in a fearful state of disquiet.

Among the early arrivals in the Rosengarten is Frau Uta, proprietor of the Herbstcafé, she who, in better times, had Florian to help her out by serving ice cream. Her main concern today is keeping her husband at some distance from the beer stand, but she eventually relents, allows him to go off for his first stein, calling after him, “only one glass!” She notes the arrival of other “local celebrants of May Day,” who come by way of the underpass “that led here beneath the rail tracks”: “at first smaller families, clearly finding their charges somewhat hard to bear, but then the lonely older people began to drift in, and the married couples . . . “ beer flowed from the kegs,” and “the first Bockwursts were being thrown onto the cooker.”

Next come the members of the “so-called Enlarged Kana Symphony,” who climb up on the stage in their “lovely red uniforms.” They take their seats and begin tuning up, “here and there the tuba or the trombone or the saxophone honked, the musicians in the first string section mewled on their violins.” Finally the tuning was done and “the first beats sounded at the gesture of Herr Feldmann,” and the onlookers perked up, “steins were clinked together, the first Rostbratwurst went down the hatch, of course with Bautz’ner mustard, only with Bautz’ner” [note how L.K. is always aware of what kind of gravy, or beer, or mustard the citizens of Thuringia prefer].

Meanwhile, here by himself, the Deputy grumbles that the right May Day atmosphere is missing, and the orchestra plays “Yesterday,” because, “according to Herr Feldmann [first violinist and orchestra conductor, who seems totally in charge now], this always went down well. “The wind players veins bulging, stage fright clearly visible on all of their faces, almost the exact same expression on the faces of the audience watching them, as if each were waiting for the other to launch the May Day celebrations with their inimitable atmosphere, but this inimitable atmosphere did not begin for quite a while yet.” Missing from this event is the Boss, the one-time unofficial conductor of the orchestra; in a shocking turn of events he has been murdered about a hundred pages earlier. Also missing is Florian, who has absconded from Kana and is now a fugitive from justice.

For that “inimitable atmosphere,” of May Day to set in it takes time, and beer. “Somehow the first sip of the third stein always brought about the miracle: the men’s gazes cleared up, the conversation no longer seemed as if gagged and stuttering, but suddenly came to life, laughter was heard to the left, then to the right, and within minutes the crowd was buzzing like a beehive, Hoffmann seemed in particularly good spirits, walking back and forth among the tables, a wide grin on his face as he greeted anyone he could chat with . . .” On plays the symphony, until it takes a short intermission. By now the beer has done its work and the crowd beings singing “a dear little ditty from the old times,” Wenn Mutti früh zur Arbeit geht [When Momma Goes Early to Work].

For three pages the dreary unease that hangs over Kana, and Thuringia, and all of Germany seems to have been dispelled. That is, until the railway crossing barrier (Schlagbaum) puts the quietus on the celebration. The singers “sat hunched over, banging their steins on the table, by the end they were yelling, so that nobody could complain about the atmosphere, and there were no complaints until the early afternoon, and the railroad crossing proved to be the only reason for the sudden silence of the celebratory crowd . . . they’d heard it thousands and thousands of times, as, twenty-five or thirty meters to the left of the tunnel, the mechanism that signaled approaching trains began ringing with its own peculiar timbre, of course, from here below, in the Rosengarten, they couldn’t see it, they only heard it, but they knew what was going to happen: namely that the rail-crossing gate would creak enormously and lower, and the wait would begin for the train, and they too now began waiting for the train coming from the north or the south, either from Jena or Saafeld . . . they waited and waited, two minutes went by, three minutes, five minutes, nothing happened, the orchestra stopped playing and came down from the stage, but the revelers were still waiting for the train, although they waited in vain, because no train arrived either from the south or the north, and what happened next was merely what always happened these days:

“the rail-crossing gate, after eight or ten minutes, as if it too had been waiting in vain for something to arrive, began to rise with a somewhat sadder creaking than before, well, and that was the end of May Day, people struggled to their feet, and they slowly began walking to the underpass . . .” on their way home. For me the sad performance—slowly down, then slowly back up—of the creaking railway gate that has greeted no train is, perhaps, the climax of the whole novel, emblematic of the sorry state of Thuringia, and all of Germany (and, maybe, of the whole world?). The universe these days is in a mess, and the trains we expect to come, bringing aid and succor, do not arrive. Thirty-five pages later, while police are combing the town for Florian, he sits calmly watching the operations of a different rail-crossing gate across town, which performs the same creaking and sorrowful movements: slowly down until reaching a stop; then stopping, waiting . . . then giving up on the train and slowly working its way back up.  

The Apocalyptic Theme

Herscht 07769 features a series of events in the town of Kana that leave the nerves of the locals in tatters. Nearly all of the smalltown characters want nothing more than to be left alone to live out their quotidian lives, but life has other ideas. The main plotline, driving the action of the book, concerns the activities of neo-Nazis in East Germany. But from the beginning of his novel it is clear that L.K. has in mind not just the dire socio-political scene in Thuringia and Germany, but also the even more dire metaphysical state of the world as a whole.

The epigraph of the novel is this: “Hope is a mistake.” In an interview the author has explained that this is not to be construed as a pessimistic take on human life. The point, maybe, being that the universe came about by way of a blunder or mistake, and hoping for humanity is caught up as well in the consequences of that mistake. Florian Herscht first learns about quantum theory when he attends evening classes in adult education, conducted by a retired teacher of physics, Adrian Köhler (here and above I use the abbreviation A.K. in reference to him). In his apparently autistic way of thinking, Florian settles on a simplistic interpretation of the complex facts. For him it is as if God were mixing thunderbolts, playing around one day—for lack of anything constructive to do—and He accidentally pounded together two of the wrong thunderbolts, and then the universe went ‘Big Bang.’

Puzzling out what Herr Köhler was trying to say, Florian reasons that “this meant that the entire universe rested upon the inexplicable fact that in a closed vacuum, in addition to every one billion particles of matter, one billion antiparticles also arise, and when matter and antimatter meet they extinguish each other, but then suddenly they don’t, because after that one billion and first particle, the one billion and first antiparticle does not arise, and so this one material particle remains in existence, or directly it brings existence into life: as abundance, as surplus, as excess, as a mistake, and the entire universe exists because of this, only because of this, namely without it, the universe never would have existed . . .”

One huge problem for Florian is A.K.’s assertion that so far science has not been able to explain a lot of this. Jumbled up in Florian’s head are several points from the lectures. For example: “Herr Köhler had explained that the process within a closed vacuum begins in such a way that within nothing and out of nothing suddenly there will be something, or rather: this event begins, which is fully impossible, nonetheless it begins with the simultaneous birth of those one billion particles of matter and those one billion antiparticles that immediately extinguish each other such that a photon is released . . .”

The citations above are taken from the first five pages of the book, but on p. 15 we learn that, faced with this “special vacuum in which from nothing there will be something,” A.K. has “ceased his own inquiries into quantum physics . . . turned away from quantum physics because it could not be reconciled with common sense.” In his lectures he emphasizes the wonderful world of elementary particles, while in the back of his mind he mulls over “the horrific world of elementary particles.” In his retirement Köhler has turned to something less esoteric and more practical; he has begun running his own amateur meteorological station. He has “fallen in love with meteorology,” since it is nothing like quantum theory, “where acceptance of the absurd was a basic requirement.”

Meanwhile, Florian has interpreted what he learned at the lectures to predict the imminent destruction of the whole universe. A.K. tries to reassure him, telling him to go back to being a baker, a profession for which he was trained in vocational school. “Why not stick with what you studied?” Surely “one day the quantum physicists will figure things out, only we won’t live to see the day.” Woebegone Florian tells A.K. “that he would never be the same as he was before, because he never could have thought that the world, under the danger of a redoubtable fact, would be laid open to a destruction that could occur at any moment . . . if, in fact, everything teeters on this knife edge of destruction, then it must have been this way when we came into being as well . . .” Florian’s misgivings lead Köhler to ponder ever more pessimistically the fact that “physics did not know the answers to the most essential and fundamental questions.”

Florian assumes that Germany’s leader, Angela Merkel, a physicist herself, is the perfect one to approach with his fears for the universe. She can perhaps convene a special session of the Security Council of the United Nations, where experts will discuss how “the relativity of time and space and so-called events would sooner or later lead to the inevitable disappearance of reality.” The apocalyptic danger, as viewed through Florian’s eyes, is amplified at several other points in the novel. On his way to Berlin, hoping to meet personally with the Chancellor, Florian cogitates over what he will tell her: “inasmuch as it is true that something arises from nothing, it can also occur that after the emergence from nothing of one billion antiparticles along with one billion particles, the one surplus material particle does not appear as it presumably occurred during the Big Bang . . . but that instead, due to a diabolical breaking of symmetry in the usually balanced emergence of particles and antiparticles, there could suddenly arise, in one horrific moment, one surplus antiparticle, and while the one billion particles and one billion antiparticles are busy annihilating each other, and the well-known one billion photons are floating away, the remaining single surplus antiparticle could be creating a new reality, an anti-universe, the lethal mirror image of reality . . .”

In Florian’s mind the essential problem lies in the fact that God, or Somebody, made a mistake right at the beginning: “the world arose by sheer contingency, and that sheer contingency could just as easily take it back.” As for quantum physics and the consolations of science, there is certainly no consolation that “for the deepest, the most important, the most fundamental questions there were no answers and there would never be any answers.” Elementary particle physics would never be able to come up with the answers “simply because particle physics was always placing barriers before its own self, barriers it could never overcome, because these barriers ensued from the system of human logic, and at that point thought became, as it were, entangled in its own self . . .”

This notion of human reason tangled up in its own self suggests the philosophical concept of the antinomy (not mentioned in the novel). There are many classic examples. Take this one. Draw a square and write the following words within the square: “All sentences written within this square are false.” So you are attempting to express a truth, but since your truth is written within the square, then it too must be false. Logic is entangled in illogicality, words are stuck in perpetual hiccups, with the implication that if we must express our logic in potentially treacherous words, that logic must always be potentially flawed.

The sudden disappearance of Köhler from his home in Kana is never explained. He is gone for over a year, then suddenly reappears. Florian assumes that world leaders have heeded his warnings and have taken Köhler off to the U.N., or to some scholarly enclave, where they can pick his mind over the intricacies of quantum physics. Another explanation, more than dubious, could be that the physicist in A.K. gets caught up in the paradoxical mess that quantum physics has produced: he, a surplus antiparticle, or a photon, is spirited away into a different dimension. When he returns he is a changed man; soon he descends into dementia and dies at the end of the book. As for the apocalyptic theme of Herscht 07769, it haunts the entire narrative, making the malaise that envelops the denizens of Kana not just a quotidian malaise, but a metaphysical conundrum.  

One problem for me, and, surely, for countless other readers of the novel: we are not physicists, so we lack the basis for evaluating the argument presented against quantum physics. We wonder: to what extent does the argument have validity? I would like to see a review of this novel written by someone who is an expert on precisely this topic. The Bach theme of the novel suggests different problems, but in some ways its quandaries resemble those to which the apocalyptic theme gives rise.

The Bach Theme

Love of Bach apparently developed early in L.K.’s life and works. One example: his novel published thirty-six years ago, in 1989, The Melancholy of Resistance, contains an extensive treatment of music theory, the intricacies of harmonics, with a particular emphasis on Bach. Quite possibly the author’s decision to live and research a novel in Thuringia was based on the historical importance of Bach in this region. Johan Sebastian Bach’s prominence in the plotline of Herscht 07769 is established near the beginning, when the Boss and his assistant Florian—who work as graffiti removers—learn that the Bachhaus in Eisenach has been desecrated. Two large graffiti, depicting a wolf’s head and the word WE have been spray-painted on either side of the entrance gate to the museum. In trying to explain how this happened, the museum guard “held his two hands apart,” one more gesture of resigned helplessness. Arch patriot that he is, the Boss is outraged by this act, since he views the music of Bach as heaven-sent, the embodiment of the spirit of Germany. Soon he has his Nazi cell working to prevent further incidences of spray-painting and trying to apprehend the perpetrators. This continues throughout the action of much of the novel, as more graffiti appears on Bach sites around Thuringia.  

The Boss has put together a small group of amateur musicians, who gather for rehearsals every Saturday. While they prefer playing pop tunes, he forces Bach upon them. In prospect is a big concert of classical music, the inaugural event of this new Kana Symphony, but since they never can quite get Bach down right, this concert must be continually postponed. The Boss’ neo-Nazi cohort is equally unreceptive to the music of Bach, and even when he is murdered 250 pages into the novel, the Boss is not treated to any Bach music at his funeral. Nazis attend from all over Germany, even from a few other European countries, to honor this staunch adherent of fascism, but the music played, ironically, is “Yesterday,” by the Beatles. We are not told who selected the musical pieces to be played, but surely this is the work of Herr Feldmann, first violinist and retired Latin and German teacher. Feldmann is a Jew, but there is no indication that he deliberately picks for the funeral music that the Boss hated. Rather, Feldmann loves the Beatles and probably assumes that it is a great honor to have “Yesterday” played at one’s funeral.

Later on the Bach theme of the novel plays itself out most prominently in connection with the main protagonist, Florian Herscht. The Boss has been forcing Florian, whom he has made into a sort of stepson, to attend the Saturday rehearsals. He hopes that the naïve young man will pick up an appreciation of Bach’s music—even though the orchestra plays Bach badly at these rehearsals. Eventually, somehow miraculously—this comes some one hundred pages into the book—Florian does begin to appreciate listening to Bach on his laptop: “and not only the Brandenburg Concertos, but other pieces as well, for example the great Passions, he was immediately entranced, and he himself didn’t understand why, at the beginning of the beginning, he hadn’t listened to the Boss when he said that every secret of life is in Johan Sebastian . . .”

Soon he has begun immersing himself in the cantatas and feels that “the messages were getting through to him, that’s what he called them—messages—the sounds and the ensemble of sounds, although he did not want to decipher them, moreover, his immediate impression was that these messages had no meaning, they were beautiful in and of themselves, they were wondrous in and of themselves, they merely were, he did not wish to translate them, and there was no need, because they were not transmitting something, they only were what they were . . .” Soon he is considering “going to Leipzig and listening to a Bach performance in the Thomaskirche.” This is a trip I’m sure that L.K. himself made, when he was residing in Thuringia, researching and writing his novel.

Florian begins sensing that the music of Bach contains instructions in the event of a catastrophe, but he does not know the exact contents of the instructions. In one of his letters to Angela Merkel he decides to let her in on what he has learned about Bach: “before Bach he’d been deaf, and after Bach he became deaf to everything else, he admitted that he had no need of any kind of music which was not composed by Johann Sebastian Bach, for him this encounter had granted him an experience that seizes a person in the presence of greatness and he had been seized by Bach, seized by genius . . . for him Bach was not even music but heaven itself, and he was certain that the Chancellor would understand this . . . he was not a religious person . . . when he was brought here to Kana as an adult, there was no chance to get close to any religion, but now he had gotten close to Bach . . . and what was necessary now was for the Chancellor to clearly understand the necessity of involving Bach in the negotiations which, he presumed, were taking place, although as of yet behind closed doors . . . and how did he know that the universe was much more capacious . . . than what the human mind accepted as extant? well, from him!!! it was precisely Bach who had shown him, it was Bach who could show anyone . . .”

By this point Bach has become a kind of deity for Florian, and in this, his most recent letter to Angela Merkel, he presents Bach as a solution to the looming catastrophe instigated by quantum theory. The Chancellor must listen to Bach, and the Security Council of the U.N. must listen to Bach, and Bach’s music must be played incessantly “on every television station, every radio broadcast, in every school, every department store and sports stadium . . . for this dear Earth, and everything that we think about it and the universe that surrounds us, is perhaps but a mere misunderstanding . . .” In a word Bach must become “something like the air” all around us, the universe has come into existence by mistake, and all of our apprehensions are but misapprehensions, and Bach, and only Bach, can rectify the malaise in which the human race finds itself enveloped.

In the latter pages of the novel, after Florian has become a fugitive from justice, after he has begun living like a wild animal, he can no longer keep his laptop charged. But he has no need of the laptop, because Bach’s music is now in his ears and head perpetually, even in his sleep. Bach has become for him “a personal state of being, namely, he was no longer hearing Bach, he was inside Bach . . .” Now he realizes “that the remedy for the Last Judgment perhaps did not lie in science or the politics it had given rise to, but that the remedy lay wholly and singularly in Johan Sebastian Bach, the path to Bach led through the structures of his works, and these structures were perfect, and therefore if the structures were perfect, then the themes built upon them were also perfect, then the harmonics embodying these themes were also perfect, and if the harmonics embodying these themes were perfect, then every single note was perfect . . .” etc.

So goes the Bach theme in the novel, which presents a kind of intuitive answer to the theme of the apocalyptic. As if the only answer we have to the conundrum of the whole universe being mired in an irrevocable mistake is to steep ourselves in artistic genius, which somehow, intuitively, can guide us past the maelstrom. As mentioned above, there are several problems inherent in making Bach’s music such an important structural element of the novel. For one, most readers—such as me—have only a superficial understanding of the music of Bach. To really appreciate the Bach theme in the novel you have to be a musician; and you have to know Bach well. This limits the readership of the novel radically. Or, rather, limits the number of readers who can truly grasp and appreciate the novel. Who else but the brilliant L.K. could write a novel that demands—for full appreciation—a profound knowledge of both quantum physics and the music of Bach?

Another issue: when an author lends music such importance in his novel, he is somehow trapped by the medium in which he works: words on pages of a book. Here is a possible comparison. What if someone wrote a novel about Claude Monet, featuring his life and all his artistic works? The book might contain detailed descriptions in words of what Monet’s impressionistic paintings look like. But if the reader cannot actually view and contemplate the paintings themselves, think of how much is missing from the book. Even if the author includes reproductions of the paintings as illustrations in the book, these illustrations are a meagre substitute for the actual paintings themselves. For the Bach theme to be presented validly and fully, we need an audiobook, and in that audiobook the musical pieces mentioned must be played. I wonder if L.K. has considered this issue in commissioning audiobooks of his latest novel, to be read in any number of languages.

Sagging Verisimilitude

L.K. is a master at writing rounded, believable characters. He dares in his works to present highly esoteric themes in a more than demanding writing style. In Herscht 07769, however, he is not entirely successful at showing us what the bad guys, the neo-Nazis are like, and he has problems putting together an action narrative. The leader of the Nazis and Florian’s mentor, known only as “the Boss,” is something of an enigma. His right-wing views ring true, but so much else about him does not. Why, e.g., would he decide, in effect, to adopt this young, semi-retarded youth and bring him to live in Kana? What kind of background does the Boss come out of? We don’t know. We know literally nothing about his past, nothing of his parents or siblings, and we wonder why he has no family attachments. I, for one, also find it highly improbable that this man, a deeply flawed Nazi thug, has founded and now leads the local Kana amateur orchestra.

When the Ringers—the Boss’s most vehement enemies in Kana—are attacked by a wolf while on a picnic, the Boss is one of the first to hear the news. He rushes home for a weapon, drives to the scene of the attack at the Leuchtenburg Castle, and shoots the wolf. Given time and space restrictions, this appears to have been an impossible act. Later on one of the most shocking events in the novel occurs when the neo-Nazis bomb the local gas station, killing Rosario and Nadir, who run the station. Improbably, the Boss decides to record this act on a cell phone, although the most savvy of the Nazis (and the only woman) Karin tries to stop him. Why would he do something so stupid as to provide the police evidence of his own crime?

Later the Boss hands over this cell phone, containing the incriminating videos, to the naïve Florian. Not likely. Even almost impossible. At some point the Boss would have realized he never should have made the videos, and he would have destroyed this evidence. The fact of the existence of these videos drives subsequent developments in the plot. The ingenuous Florian eventually watches the videos on the cell phone, and this so shocks him that he takes on an entirely new, murderous personality. In sum, the most important events in the second half of the novel are predicated on facts that are almost entirely lacking in verisimilitude.

As for Karin, she is portrayed as highly intelligent and cunning, but we never learn much about her. Why and how did she become a Nazi? Does she have any education, any factors in her past that lead her to adopt such a life? We don’t know. L.K. tells us more about such minor characters as auntie Ingrid, and he makes minor characters more rounded than any of the members of the Nazi cell. It appears as if the author, who finds the neo-Nazi characters repellant, is reluctant to get into their heads and lives, the way he does with so many of the locals featured in the book.

The main protagonist, Florian Herscht, is one in a long line of literary characters who are kind, gentle, extremely naïve, sexless, even a bit retarded. Everyone in Kana loves Florian, and with good reason. In the first half of the book he is depicted as a gentle giant, always prepared to lend a hand to the locals. One of his main confidants, Frau Ringer, opines that “for him sexuality was shameful, that it was subjugation, a lack of transcendence with regard to nature from which everyone must try to liberate themselves.” This sounds more like the views of Frau Ringer (or the author) than those of Florian, who would not have pondered this deeply into the issue. He is simply afraid of sex and women.

In the last third of the book Florian becomes obsessed with Bach, which is, I suppose, possible. But he also turns into a vicious killer, which is much less believable. When he discovers the videos of the bombing on the cell phone that the Boss has entrusted to him, Florian seems to snap. His whole personality changes, and he kills a man who has been almost a father to him, the Boss. The rest of the book describes Florian on the lam, avoiding the police, while carrying out still more murders—in an attempt to eliminate the entire neo-Nazi contingent from Kana. In a rather skewed plot development, Karin also is out to murder her former cohorts—who have fled Kana to other cities. Apparently she wants to eliminate all possible evidence of the crimes they committed together. Toward the final pages of the book all the neo-Nazis from Kana are dead except Karin. She and Florian are back in Kana, hunting each other down.

The novel presents certain mystifications that are never cleared up. We have already mentioned the disappearance of Köhler and his reappearance over a year later, an event never explained. A central question of the first half of the book involves who is responsible for the spray-paintings of graffiti at the Bach sites. Both the neo-Nazi cell led by the Boss and the local police try their best to stop the desecrations and catch the perps, but they are all unsuccessful. Then, late in the book, Florian—who is a fugitive, living in the wild—returns to the Bachhaus in Eisenach, “with its Bach statue in front of the entrance.” Here, again rather improbably, Florian catches, with very little effort, the fifteen-year-old boy who has been doing the spray-painting. The boy explains why the graffiti always consists of a wolf’s head and the word WE. He was supposed to paint the words WE ARE COMING but never had time to finish more than the first word. Who are the WE who pay the boy to spray the graffiti? Apparently some secret lovers and defenders of wolves, but the whole business of who is behind the spray paintings—and why Bach sites are selected as targets—is left vague.

Late in the book, as one more spring arrives, a sort of guardian angel figure, an enormous golden eagle, begins accompanying Florian as he journeys around, looking for more Nazis to murder. When Karin comes back into the picture, intent on killing Florian, the eagle attacks her twice. The second time she manages to shoot the bird and kill it. Who sent this bird into the plot and exactly why only L.K. knows for sure, but like several other plotlines in the book, the appearance of the eagle is gratuitous.

One Long Sentence

Critics have made much of the sui generis structure of Herscht 07769, which is written in one long loop of a sentence, devoid of paragraph breaks and containing only one full stop; this period comes on the last page of the book, p. 406. Such a structure reminded me of another novel that is considered a “difficult read,” Austerlitz, by W.G. Sebald. Here is what I wrote about that book in a review:

The Novel of User-Unfriendly

“I’ve seldom encountered a novel made deliberately so difficult to read . . . The relentless narrative plods on inexorably, providing no breaks for separate chapters, seldom even for paragraphs. The reader is forced to swim through the choppy waters of the dense prose, finding no purchase for a temporary rest. Only the occasional em-dash intrudes into the incessant flow of words, and you grab onto it when you can, resting there briefly and tenuously before breast-stroking off again, through lengthy sentences with whitecaps rife with detail. Help, help, somebody throw me a life preserver!

“There is a certain deliberate ‘Germanness’ in the way the whole novel is written, as if the author wishes his very narrative style to embody the way Germans need to have things thoroughly catalogued. Later on, when we come to the heart of the story—the tale of the Holocaust—attention to petty detail is a constant: emphasis on the German “mania for order and purity,” descriptions of how the Germans plundered the personal belongings of the Jews they arrested, made endless listings of all the household items, how they kept detailed accounts of all activities in the concentration camps, how efficiently and ruthlessly they murdered innocent people, crossing them off their lists, one by one.

“A page full of dialogue is faster and easier to read than a page crammed with narrative. Most novels use direct speech to give the reader a break from long narrative descriptions. Not this one. How about throwing in a bit of humor, to ease the strain? Nope. You won’t find a good laugh in the whole of Austerlitz. What is the point of making the reading of a book so unaccommodating for the reader? I can only assume that since the subject matter concerns man’s inhumanity to man, Sebald wants to get a feel for this subject into the very narrative style of the book. Austerlitz lives a life of agony, the Jews suffered unspeakable things, so here, reader, in your face: here’s a touch of how oppressive life can feel.” [full review of Austerlitz is available on my blog, U.R. Bowie on Russian Literature, and on the website for Dactyl Review]

There’s that oppressive malaise swathing the whole of Austerlitz, spooking its style, and L.K.’s novel Herscht 07769 also concerns itself with an unease that has descended on East Germany, and all of Germany, and even all of the universe. So is the malaise expressed in the style of the book, in the way the author chooses to tell it in that one long sentence? Is the style of L.K.’s novel similar to that of Sebald in Austerlitz? Not really. I’ve recently read and reviewed an earlier novel by L.K., The Melancholy of Resistance (first published in 1989, when the author was thirty-five). While it does use periods, the book frowns upon paragraphs and direct speech, piling up words in dense glomps that pack full every page. For the reader this novel presents a hard slog, much, much more difficult reading than Herscht 07769, and the darkness of its tone, its bleak pessimism is truly oppressive.

Now seventy-one, L.K seems to have mellowed out a bit on the brink of old age. The one long sentence of his latest work presents few difficulties to the reader. Herscht 07769 is written in a style easy to read. Although there are no breaks for paragraphs, there are convenient places for new paragraphs to begin. Despite the subject matter, the style is not made deliberately oppressive. Then again, the idea of the one long sentence, devoid of full stops, is little more than a gimmick. Notwithstanding the absence of that one punctuation mark, the period, there are plenty of full stops in the narrative, indicated by semicolons, exclamation points, question marks, etc. Critics emphasizing the lack of full stops are making much of nothing.

Although there are no chapters indicated, in the front matter of the book, right before page one there is a page titled “Rainbow Strands.” There are thirteen of these, which suggests that the book has thirteen chapters. They are indicated without capitalization. E.g., the first of these is “within nothing out of nothing;” the second is “from somewhere to somewhere.” The titles of these “rainbow strands” suggest themes in the novel, but those themes don’t appear to be directly expressed each time under the given title. Sometimes, but not always, the titles come directly out of elsewhere in the text. Here is an example: “he [Florian] had no need for any kind of music not composed by Johann Sebastian Bach, for him this encounter had granted him an experience that seizes a person in the presence of greatness and he had been seized by Bach, seized by genius . . .” This cited passage comes on p. 206, under the “rainbow strand” chapter titled “he served big scoops” (Ch. 8), which begins on p. 203. But when we get to p. 222, we come to the next chapter (or rainbow strand), Ch. 9, and its title is taken from the passage just quoted: “in the presence of greatness.”

As for “he served big scoops,” this chapter title is taken from another direct quotation in the text (p. 199), describing how Florian sometimes helped out Frau Uta at the Herbstcafé “at the peak of ice-cream season,” serving ice cream to children. What is the point of playing this kind of game with the “rainbow strands” and the uncapitalized titles? I’m not sure there is a point, although some percipient critic (not me) may suggest how this sort of thing enhances the narrative structure of the novel or elucidates certain themes. Personally, I think that L.K.’s works might profit somewhat by elimination of the silly game-playing that he loves. But then, I’m not much of a game-player, and although I appreciate Vladimir Nabokov—I consider him perhaps the best fiction writer of the twentieth century—I do not much care for the gamey aspect of his work either.

At times L.K. just seems to be having fun with his little mystifications (see some of these discussed above). Unlike Sebald when he wrote Austerlitz, the narrator of Herscht 07769 apparently enjoyed writing his book, which—unlike the ponderous and oppressive Melancholy of Resistance—is leavened throughout with light humor. Near the end of the novel he throws in one more joke of an incident: so it turns out, Angela Merkel finally has answered Florian’s many letters to her. Her letter, however, arrives at the Kana P.O. when Florian is not in town to receive it, having gone renegade and fled Kana. Postmistress Jessica is not there either, having died tragically in a traffic accident, and her husband, Herr Volkenant, is so grief-stricken that he is barely functioning. Therefore, there is no one among the characters to open and read that letter, and only L.K. can know for sure what the Chancellor had to say. Merkel is in retirement these days, no longer preoccupied with matters of the state. Maybe someone could write to her and ask her to reveal what advice she had for Florian in her letter.

d

Final thought: does L.K. deserve the Nobel Prize in Literature? From what I know of him—and I have not read by far the majority of his works—I would say absolutely yes. The two novels that I have read, and reviewed, are direct descendants of Faulkner, Proust, Kafka, Dostoevsky, Joyce, and many other great classical writers. This is literary fiction written at a high level of skill and intelligence that hardly exists anymore. Just to speak of American writers from the first quarter of the twenty-first century, I know of no one—absolutely no American writer—who writes literary fiction so profoundly.

 

 


Sunday, July 13, 2025

Book Review Article, László Krasznahorkai, THE MELANCHOLY OF RESISTANCE

 

U.R. Bowie

Book Review Article

László Krasznahorkai

The Melancholy of Resistance

Translated from the Hungarian by George Szirtes, New Directions, 2000, 314 pp. English translation first published in 1998, Hungarian original in 1989.

 

Part One 

“An Emergency: Introduction”

The Malaise

[Note: the part in quotes above is Krasznahorkai’s. These brief titles for various sections of the book are all he gives the reader to go on. I see this as a kind of perversity on the part of the storyteller, a middle finger stuck up in the face of the reader. Figure it out for yourself, sucker. Therefore, in my review—in aide of the reader—I sometimes provide chapter numbers and titles, the things the writer himself should have provided. A few breaks for paragraphs would have been a nice thing too. The words are crammed together in huge glomps on every page, so as to squeeze the tender brains of any reader. Dialogue is not set off in separate paragraphs, but placed in quotation marks in amidst the glomps.]

From the very first page we are given to know that something is badly out of kilter in the nation state of Hungary, or if not in Hungary, then at least in the vicinity of one small unnamed Hungarian town that is the setting of this novel. What is the prototype town? Where in Hungary are we? In reading Krasznahorkai’s latest published novel, Herscht 07769, one can click around briefly on the internet and discover, rather easily, the prototype town in East Germany where the action is set. Not so in The Melancholy of Resistance. Checking place names, street names, names of suburbs, etc., online gets us nowhere. The author has taken a potpourri of names from places all over the country and placed them in his anonymous town. Nor is any date ever mentioned. What year does the action of this novel take place? Dunno. In the time out of mind of surrealism.

The action, we are told, is set in “the icebound estates of the southern lowlands,” in a year in which the “bone-chilling cold” is relentless and no snow ever falls. It has been “fifteen to twenty degrees below freezing since the beginning of December.” Then again, “Time had somehow stopped,” and it was “as if some vital yet undetectable modification had taken place in the eternally stable composition of the air.” What is going on? “One’s daily habits were disrupted by a sense of ever-spreading all-consuming chaos that rendered the future unpredictable, the past unrecallable and ordinary life so haphazard that people simply assumed whatever could be imagined might come to pass, that if there were only one door in a building it would no longer open, that wheat would grow head downwards into the earth not out of it, and that, since one could only note the symptoms of disintegration, the reasons for it remaining unfathomable and inconceivable, there was nothing anyone could do except to get a tenacious grip on anything that was still tangible . . .”

From the very beginning of the book this anticipation of some hideous inevitable catastrophe is in the air. Ill omens abound, presaging the town’s inexorable decline into chaos. The huge water tower had begun “to sway dangerously above the tiny houses surrounding it,” “the clock of the Catholic Church in the main square, immobile for decades, startled everyone by beginning to strike,” and the gigantic poplar tree, “which for generations had been the marvel of the town,” had collapsed next to the Hotel Komló and “was lying lifeless against the hotel’s Hétvezér Square façade.”

We’re into the horrible sense of malaise before the action of the novel even begins, before we even reach the actual town, since the story begins with one character trying to return home by train. Continuous and repeated mention is made of “the unusual and anarchic events of the immediate past” (just in this town or all over Hungary?). We are never informed what happened to create such a state of affairs, although it is certain that “the irreversible process of ruin, schism and disintegration would continue according to its own infrangible rules.” All of the townspeople seem resigned to the certainty of what is soon to arrive: utter calamity. János Valuska, the only positive character in the whole novel (more, much more on him later), caught up in his belief in the basic goodness of the universe and the harmony of the heavenly spheres, is the one person not affected by the “epidemic of panic.” At one point he seems to believe that the townspeople, through their incessant talk of calamity to come, are bringing this thing upon themselves.

“Everyone he met was preoccupied by the notion of ‘the collapse into anarchy’, a state that, in the general opinion, was no longer avoidable. Everyone was talking about ‘the unstoppable stampede into chaos’, the ‘unpredictability of daily life’ and ‘the approaching catastrophe’ without a clear notion of the full weight of these frightening words, since, he surmised, this epidemic of fear was not born out of some genuine, daily increasing certainty of disaster but of an infection of the imagination whose susceptibility to its own terrors might eventually lead to an actual catastrophe . . . He tried to persuade his friends of this” [of their self-fulfilling prophecy of calamity to come] but “they refused to listen to him,” and “it saddened him most when in tones of unrelieved gloom they proclaimed that the period they were living in was ‘an unfathomable hell between a treacherous future and an unmemorable past’, . . .”

I have read certain critics who opine that The Melancholy of Resistance is a political allegory, and that it makes veiled allusions to the actual situation in Communist Hungary in the late eighties of the twentieth century, when it as published. We may recall that these were times of great ferment, not only in Hungary, but in the Soviet Union and all the countries of the Eastern Socialist Bloc. Big changes were in the offing, and very soon there would be no more U.S.S.R. and no more Communist Bloc. But, in the first place, László Krasznahorkai (hereinafter L.K.) has mentioned in interviews that his books are, largely, unconcerned with topical political themes. In the second place, I can’t imagine that at the time of such intense political ferment, including anticipation and hopes of better times to come, people would become immersed in a firm belief that nothing but utter woe was in the offing. Therefore, we can only conclude that the theme of this book involves a kind of metaphysical malaise that has descended upon the human race. The narrative action of the novel reinforces this notion. At any rate, this is uniformly the state of mind of the townspeople at the point when a very strange circus comes to town.

Chapter One

The Prologue: Mrs. Plauf Rides a Nightmare Train Back Home

We begin the action with what is a short story in itself, describing a nightmare train ride by one petit-bourgeois denizen of the principal town of the novel. Mrs. Plauf, 58, is on her way home from one of her occasional visits to see relations elsewhere in Hungary. One wonders how things are with these relatives (we are not told), since a perennial question that haunts the reader’s mind throughout the narrative is this: are things in such a dire state all over Hungary—or even all over the world—as they are in the town where the action is set?

Mrs. Plauf is the main character of the novel only in this introductory chapter, although she is also prominently featured in the final pages of the book, its gruesome and macabre conclusion. Here at the beginning she is trying to get home, it is already late, and the passenger train heading east does not show up. This creates the “emergency” of L.K.’s title for Part One. Two old wooden-seated coaches are put into service to transport the stranded passengers fifty miles farther eastward. As she enters the coach, good citizen that she is, pillar of the middle class, Mrs. Plauf with her worthless first-class ticket finds herself enveloped by the underclass, who emit “a stench of garlic sausage blended with the aroma of mixed-fruit brandy and cheap pungent tobacco.”

The rabble wafting that stench will end up being the prime movers of the action of the book, “an almost [delete that almost] menacing ring of loud-mouthed, belching ‘common peasants.’” Just think: this book was published before the Soviet Union collapsed and Communism faded off into history. One wonders how L.K.’s novel was received in a country still officially espousing the glories of the peasants and workers. At any rate, Marx and Engels, were they able to peruse The Melancholy of Resistance, would be rolling and writhing in their graves.

If The Melancholy of Resistance were to emit an odor that embodies the tenor of the whole book, it would be precisely the stench just mentioned. For this novel is by no means a piece of sweet-smelling, effervescent fiction. Those readers who want fragrance, optimism, characters of grace and beauty, should give up on the book before they even begin. The novel should have this caveat emptor on its cover: “Tender-hearted Readers, Lovers of Humanity, Believers in God’s Good Grace: back off, desist, don’t touch even the first page of this misanthropic book. It is NOT for you.”

On the train, surrounded by the utterly uncouth underclass, poor Mrs. Plauf finds herself accosted by one particular “‘peculiarly silent’ unshaven man, swigging from a bottle of stinking brandy” and wearing “a dirty broadcloth coat.” Note the mention of the silence, which is soon to become a leitmotif of the whole book, a special ominous screaming silence that will accompany men engaged in hideous acts. Note also the mention of the dirty coat. Not since Gogol’s wonderful story, “The Overcoat” has a coat been so prominently featured in a work of fiction.

Mrs. Plauf escapes the menace of the unshaven man by retreating to the WC, but he follows her there and screams obscenities at her through the locked door. She feels herself “an innocent and unsuspecting victim of the entire hostile universe, against whose absolute chill . . . there is no valid defense. It was as if the unshaven man had actually raped her. She swayed in the airless, urine-smelling booth, broken, tortured by the suspicion that she knew all there was to know, and under the spell of the formless, inconceivable, ever-shifting terror of having to seek some protection, against this universal threat, she was aware only of an emerging sense of agonizing bitterness: for she felt it was deeply unfair that she should be cast as an innocent victim rather than an untroubled survivor, she who ‘all her life had longed for peace, and never harmed a soul,’ she was forced to concede that this was of little consequence: there was no authority to which she could appeal, no one to whom she might protest, and she could hardly hope that the forces of anarchy having once been loosed could afterwards be restrained.” Soon we will learn that the book features prominently those unrestrainable forces of anarchy, which “Cry ‘Havoc!’ and let slip the dogs of war.”

After the train makes a stop an even greater horde of coarse and crude humanity boards it, and Mrs. Plauf must endure twenty more kilometers of her encroachment by the hoi polloi. Upon her arrival at her home station she disembarks, only to notice that “the forecourt had become a dense forest of fur caps, greasy peasant hats and ear flaps.” She wonders “what all these people were doing here anyway,” a question that looms throughout the whole remainder of the book and is never adequately answered. In a word, Chaos has arrived along with her in her home town, or, as W.G. Sebald has written in his blurb, “This is a book about a world into which the Leviathan has returned.”

Among those who disembark with Mrs. Plauf is “the man in the broadcloth coat.” She feels as if “something inside her had whispered that her involvement with the unshaven man—and the terrifying ordeal of the attempted rape—was far from over.” In other words, she feels as if she has already been virtually raped, and the fact of that virtual rape will, sooner or later, inevitably, lead to an actual physical rape. The tension that pervades the whole prologue of the book continues even after she leaves the train. Since they have arrived so late no public transport is running, nor do the street lights work, and she must make her way on foot homeward through dark and menacing, deserted ice-laden streets.

On her way home Mrs. Plauf comes upon an advertisement plastered on a pillar: “The Biggest Whale in the World, and Other Sensational Secrets of Nature.” She thinks, “how can we have a circus here, when the end of the world was all but imminent?” A graphic picture of this ad on the pillar takes up all of p. 26. Still walking on she encounters a huge lorry: “A shapeless hulk that smelled vaguely of fish was being drawn by a smoking, oily and wholly antediluvian wreck of a tractor.” This “satanic conveyance,” this “spectral contraption”—with some sort of Cyrillic or Turkish letters written on its side, is moving slowly down the middle of the road. Driving the tractor is “a heavily built and bewhiskered man with an indifferent expression on his face, wearing only a vest on top, with a cigarette hanging from the corner of his mouth.” Upon spotting the ambulating Mrs. Plauf, the man pulls a face and slowly raises one hand from the wheel as if to greet her. We are to meet this character again soon, as the “factotum” at the circus, and as translator of the gibberish that comes out of the mouth of the book’s most prominent freak.

Eventually the reader gets a bit of relief from the perpetual tension of the beginning pages, when Mrs. Plauf arrives safely back at her flat. We learn a few background facts about her. Already in her late fifties, she has buried two husbands and lives alone. She is estranged from her only child, “her son from the first marriage, always on the move, with never any improvement in prospect.” This is János Valuska, who will soon take on the role of one of the book’s most important characters. The internet, incidentally, informs us that the given name János means “God is gracious.” Very appropriate name for a character who consistently preaches that message, in defiance of the narrative voice and practically everyone else in the book, all of whom insist that God is far from gracious.

Mrs. Plauf leads a solitary existence these days, taking comfort in the furnishings of her flat: Persian rugs, tulle curtains and ‘gaily colored’ blinds for her windows. In her ‘heart-warmingly homely’ little apartment—note: L.K. uses single quotes to designate phrases spoken or thought within the text by his characters, creating something of an ironic effect since the phrases are often cliches—decorated with a legion of bric-a-brac and plants provided by ‘green-fingered friends,’ she basks in her approaching old age. At least she had so basked until the Chaos suddenly arrived.

Note that the friends named here, Dr. Provaznyik, Mrs. Mádai and Mrs. Mahó are among the many secondary petty-bourgeois characters in the novel who get short shrift from the narrative. Later we are to meet “the hard-of-hearing” Mr. Mádai, “the fat butcher” Mr. Nadabán (who is also a poet) and “the fanatical general engineer of the boat factory” Mr. Volent, who also remain undeveloped characters, cardboard stand-ins for real humans of flesh and blood. Others mentioned elsewhere are Wallner, “the humpbacked tailor,” Lehel, “the headmaster of the grammar school, whose stupidity was unsurpassed,” Mahovenyecz, “the obsessive chess player,” and “the hopelessly mad chief of police.” The last of these makes several appearances later in the text, and proves to be the only chief of police in any novel ever who stays dead drunk throughout the whole action of the book.

Secure in her petty-bourgeois comfort, Mrs. Plauf eats from a jar of boiled cherries in rum and consoles herself that the scum of the world, the hideous rabble she had encountered that night would eventually “scurry back where they came from, because, thought Mrs. Plauf, that is where they belong, beyond the pale of our fair and ordered world, excluded from it for ever without remission . . . while things were as they were, the streets being occupied by such, she would not so much as put her foot outside the house, would refuse to have herself involved in any manner, would not hear another word about it until this disgraceful state of affairs came to an end, until the skies brightened and mutual understanding and sober restraint were once again the order of the day.” But the skies of this book, alas, are never to brighten, and much later in the narrative action Mrs. Plauf is to make the fatal mistake of “putting her foot outside the house.”

Chapter Two

Mrs. Eszter Comes to Visit

 At the end of Chapter One—which is never so designated—a blank spot appears at the bottom of a page, informing us tacitly that the first chapter is over. The new chapter—also not designated as such—begins at the top of the next page. The first thirty-five pages (all of Chapter One) do without a single use of paragraph breaks, and all dialog is contained in parentheses within the massive glomps of text on each page. The whole remainder of the book will continue imposing on the reader this deliberate claustrophobic design, in what is, apparently, an effort to deprive the reader of any chance to catch his/her breath. In the text of this novel—and, could be, of any novel by L.K.—there is the underlying theme of the author’s perverse intent to force the reader to digest the story on his own recalcitrant terms. We, the readers, are babies in a high chair, and he, the author, is force-feeding us his pablum. “Don’t spit that back out,” he seems to be saying. Or he might be saying, “I’m writing a novel about desperate people steeped in quotidian menace. Why, therefore, should I make it easy reading for you petty-bourgeois consumers of that novel?”

 Another major character, Mrs. Eszter, now appears ringing the doorbell (in the dead of night?) at the flat of Mrs. Plauf. By this point whatever sympathy the latter may have garnered—given her ordeal on the train—has been dissipated by the clearly disapproving narrative tone adopted to describe her basking in her bourgeois contentment. Given the anti-bourgeois spirit of the narrative, the reader may expect the anti-bourgeois Mrs. Eszter to be a positive character. Think again. This book has no positive characters—excepting, perhaps, Valuska, who is something like a holy fool or idiot savant, not in his right mind.

 Mrs. Eszter, so opines the proper Mrs. Plauf, is known about town for her “‘scandalous past, loose morals, and currently confused family situation’.” She has a “rude, bumptious and pushy manner, and ‘gaudy clothes, so befitting her tub-of-lard figure.’” Through the influence of her lover, the chief of police, Mrs. Eszter has just got herself appointed “as president of the women’s committee.” She has come to visit Mrs. Plauf in what she sees as “the treacly prettiness of this ‘filthy little viper’s nest.’” Why come visit someone she despises and who despises her? It seems that Mrs. Eszter is engaged in some sort of “epoch-making campaign for renewal” of the town. She wants to grab the comfort-loving bourgeoisie by the gills and shake them into some new state of being. So it turns out, she has come to persuade Mrs. Plauf to persuade her estranged son Valuska to persuade her own estranged husband, György Eszter, to take part in her plan for the rejuvenation of the town.

 Eszter, we are told, is a celebrity in the town, the most prominent intellectual. Years ago he had kicked his vulgar wife out of his house and now lives the life of a hermit, having given up his position as director of the town’s orchestra. For some reason his wife believes that he is still influential, that he, in fact, is “the key to the operation.” Later on, when we meet this major character in the flesh, we wonder how she could have ever believed she needed him for her renewal project, given his having totally rejected the outside world and every last resident of his town. Here at the end of Chapter Two there appears to be a good deal of muddle in the plotting of the narrative. L.K.’s strong suit, so it seems, is not believability in the storyline, and his verisimilitude is often sagging.

 Toward the end of this chapter we meet one more character, Harrer the stonemason, a drunk and ne’er-do-well. He is Valuska’s landlord, renting out to him sleeping space in his laundry room. Known by his nickname, “The Vulture,” Harrer, like most of the book’s characters, has no redeeming virtues. His function in the narrative structure of the book is that of messenger boy, appearing in a number of scenes to help move the plot along. We also learn now that Mrs. Eszter herself is responsible for hiring the circus to come to town, despite misgivings in the town’s executive committee. The “fat circus manager” has first persuaded the chief of police to issue the necessary license, which the chief does, having “recognized ‘a gentleman from top to toe’ in the elegant though slightly fishy-smelling figure of the director of the world-famous company.” The chapter ends with Mrs. Eszter back home in her squalid lodgings, first copulating with the chief of police, then sleeping, while three rats venture out from beneath her bed, seeking to sample whatever food has been left lying about.

 

Part Two “The Werckmeister Harmonies”

 Chapter Three: Valuska in the Bar and with the Whale

 Closing time at the Peafeffer Bar is eight p.m. Odd fact, that. What bar closes that early? I note that in his film The Werckmeister Harmonies—based on L.K.’s novel—Béla Tarr moves the time up two hours. János Valuska, a steady patron of this low dive is depicted turning the bar into a kind of underclass planetarium, staging his production of a solar eclipse, “the business of the erf and the mune” and “the lowly place of man in the great order of the universe”—"an exposition so clear that everyone could understand it.” For some reason the regulars at the bar—the “gaggle of drivers, painters, bakers and warehousemen who patronized the place”—never tire of this repeat performance. At least they see it as a way to dissuade the barkeeper, Mr. Hagelmayer, from shutting down his business at his early closing time and ushering them out. Valuska chooses amidst them three characters, one to play the sun, another the earth, and a third the moon. As director of the production he ushers two of them (the erf and mune) in rotating movements around a stationary sun. Tarr makes this the opening scene of his film, and it is one of the film’s best.

 On this particular evening, like everyone else in town (except Valuska), the patrons of the Peafeffer—“the inn behind the watertower”—are agonizing over the general malaise that has gripped the town. “For weeks now they had lived in a state between confusion and unease bordering on nervous melancholy.” They see the impending performance of the circus just arrived in town as threatening, and they fear the “almost inevitably ill-omened whale.” Not so, Valuska, a semi-retarded character who—unlike anyone else in the novel, including the omniscient narrative voice—has total faith in the basic goodness of the cosmos and its “monumental simplicity.” He has “spent over thirty-five years cleaving the silent spume of that starry firmament,” communing bright-eyed with the stars and the planets. Like a majority of other characters in the book the working-class men in the Peafeffer are “mean and brutish, not inclined to respond to Valuska’s edifications,” but respond they do; it appears that this repeat performance always is crowned with at least moderate success.

 Caught up in the exhilaration of the artiste, Valuska is not the least concerned with the ill omen of the whale in town, with “the days of judgment” at hand. He is interested only in “the feverish excitement, that passionate tense feeling deep inside him experienced in the few dramatic seconds of silence once his wholly unvaried performance was officially over,” in the “unsurpassable sweetness and purity” that would sweep over him. After leaving the bar, he goes about his usual nocturnal business, making his rounds of the town in the night, delivering newspapers printed in the early morning hours (he is a postman). This evening he comes across “dense waves of people” pressing forward toward the main square of the town, Kossuth Square, and when he arrives there he sees “a frozen and impatient crowd.” “What was hardest of all to understand was what they wanted here, what drew them so remorselessly on to what after all was only a circus bill,” this, so the rumors went, “‘spellbound mob’ that was supposed to have grown by now into a kind of army that followed the whale from village to village and town to town.”

 Perhaps most notable of all is the “unbroken, ill-omened silence” of this mob, this “rabble of frightening, villainous-looking, good-for-nothing, possibly threatening characters thirsting after the crudest and most vulgar of miracles.” Despite hours of waiting on the part of the congregated masses, nothing seems to be going on around the huge truck containing the whale. In fact, the two-man company running the circus seems supremely contemptuous of the waiting audience, not in any hurry to begin the proceedings. This company consists of the owner, “an apparently sickly and overweight figure calling himself ‘The Director,’ and “an enormous behemoth of a man who (according to rumors) was once a boxer but had degenerated since into a general circus helper.” He will later be referred to as “factotum.” This roustabout, we will later learn, is a foreigner, and he has a special talent for translation.

 As Valuska waits along with the silent mob the “corrugated tin of the truck’s rear door” descends and the factotum, “a great mountain of flesh, well over six feet high,” appears and begins selling tickets. Valuska eagerly pays his way in and steps “into the half-lit enormous vacancy of the ‘whale-house,’” where he encounters another mountain of flesh, that of a dead whale. When he reaches the creature’s jars, he finds them “ingeniously displayed wide open,” so that he can stare down into the dark throat. Whether the whale has teeth or a baleen we are not told. If it’s a sperm whale (Ahab’s obsession) it would have teeth. If it’s a right whale, hunted by now into almost total extinction, it would have a baleen. Most logically this enormous creature would be a blue whale (which is also a baleen whale), the biggest of God’s creatures at sea or on the earth, but L.K., unlike Melville, seems unconcerned with providing the reader with the specifics of the whale. Read Moby-Dick and you discover everything you would ever want to learn about whales, and more; read The Melancholy of Resistance and you learn nothing about whales, except that they are humongous, and when dead, they stink.

                                                        The Circus, The Whale, The Prince

The so-called “circus” that makes its appearance in our Hungarian town steeped already in malaise is the strangest circus imaginable. It, in fact, is not really a circus at all: no dogs on unicycles, no acrobats, no elephants, monkeys, no clowns. Just two “acts” featured, which turn out to be not acts at all. The forementioned dead whale, advertised as spectacular and humongous, is meant to arouse awe in the beholder, but the only awe-struck beholder, so it turns out, is Valuska, who marvels at the fascinating variety of creatures with which God has populated His world. We learn that the huge mob of underclass men gathered in the central square appear to have little interest in the whale; they are waiting for the appearance, rather, of the second featured “act.”

Vague rumors abound about the presence of “a certain monster” among those in the circus company. Mrs. Eszter, now in charge of a town committee to deal with the crisis—the presence of an unruly rabble gathered in Kossuth Square—sends Valuska back where he had just come from to reconnoiter the situation. He sneaks into the circus truck containing the whale, makes his way to some room at its rear, where he overhears a conversation between the sole members of the circus company, the director and his factotum. They are arguing about the creature who (so Harrer reports elsewhere) “it seems, has three eyes and weighs no more than twenty pounds.” Known as “The Prince,” this creature cannot walk and has to be carried about. The director, apparently, has hired him as a kind of freak: “I engaged him to show himself.” But now he has been “spinning stupid stories,” provoking the rabble, who have begun following him from town to town.

The Prince’s appearance is presented only in hearsay, since in the one scene in which he appears, he is not physically described. Valuska overhears him speaking, but never gets a look at him. In his argument with the factotum, the angry director accosts The Prince, but not directly, since this creature cannot speak Hungarian. He babbles high-pitched gibberish, but (miraculously) the factotum/roustabout understands his language and translates into Hungarian. “Tell him (says the director) that I am not willing to risk the reputation of the company again. That last time was positively the last . . .” The factotum replies, “He says he doesn’t recognize a superior authority. And that the director couldn’t seriously think he would . . .” The director: “What I do know is that if he rouses the crowd rather than calming it, they will tear this town to pieces.” The factotum: “He says he likes it when things fall to pieces. Ruin comprises every form of making: lies and false pride are like oxygen in the ice . . . To his followers he is ‘The Prince’ but in his own view he is the prince of princes. Only he can see the whole, he says, because he can see there is no whole . . .” In the upshot of this quarrel the director announces that The Prince will not be allowed outside to commune with his followers in the rabble. In fact, both he and the factotum are fired.

This leaves no one in the company to run the “circus” except the director, who carries on as best he can. Going out to face the crowd in the square, he announces that the show is over for the day. Therefore, the events of that evening, when the mob goes wild and marauders wreck the town, seems at first not inspired by the words of The Prince, at least not by anything he announces that day. The director makes his final appearance the following day, after the horrendous events in which the horde wreaks havoc on the whole town. Under interrogation by an army officer—this comes after the army has been called in to quell the riot—the director falls back on his faith in art, explaining that he can help “the officers present to a clearer understanding of the principles of art, and particularly the art of the circus.” He asserts “the clear innocence of his company in the matter of the regrettable incidents of the previous night,” mentioning that the member of his company known as “The Prince” was not the chief agitator; rather, he himself was afraid of the passions of the crowd and managed to escape when the violence began. True, after the army has come to put down the violence, after scores of the marauders have been rounded up, some shot, some hanged, it turns out that The Prince and his factotum/translator have disappeared into thin air.

More is to be learned about the influence of The Prince on the mob in a different interrogation, that of one of the marauders. But we don’t need this scene to realize—it has been made abundantly clear elsewhere—that The Prince is, in reality, the Prince of Darkness, or, at least, Satan’s minion who loves and wreaks Chaos amongst men. After the riots local vociferous townspeople report that “satanic powers” were involved in what happened to their town, and that “there had been countless signs and portents of this in the preceding months.”

The Disillusionment of György Eszter

One thing I’ve noticed in the two novels that I’ve read by L.K. is that he is not unduly concerned about observing literary norms and making things believable. Note that a key scene—that in which we learn much of interest about the inner workings of the “circus”—is delivered to the reader by way of the oldest cliché in literary plotting: the device of overhearing. One of the book’s most puzzling plotlines involves how Tūnde Eszter goes to great lengths to involve her husband—really ex-husband, although they have never officially divorced—in her efforts to achieve her “moral rearmament” of the town.

We learn that he had kicked her out of his house years ago, although given her strength of character, and his weakness, we wonder how he managed that so easily. Eszter is, apparently, the leading intellectual of the town, the only intellectual, in fact, presented in this book. Local people are in awe of him, a musical prodigy and a genius; they want him and no one else to lead the new movement, so avers Mrs. Eszter. But it should be evident to any reader that he is incapable of leading any movement, this feckless man who “avoided having to give orders or indeed anything that smacked of decision.”

Eszter has a reputation in the town for doing “musicological research,” having once been the director of the town’s symphony orchestra, “a band of incompetents.” But now he has long since resigned his position and retreated to his home, which he never leaves, preferring to read books in bed and play J.S. Bach on his piano. He now concentrates on “his real mission, which he referred to as his ‘strategic withdrawal in the face of the pathetic stupidity of so-called human progress.’”

Eszter believes that “the once brotherly bond between heaven and earth was well and truly broken.” He has “rid himself of the notion that there is any suggestion of rhyme or reason in making or breaking, in birth or death, in the constant and agonizing going round in circles, postulating some enormous wonderful plan rather than a cold, mechanical, blindingly simple movement . . .” He occupies a philosophical position that is the exact antipode of the position of his acolyte and only friend, Valuska. Having given up absolutely on his world, its human inhabitants and the universe, Eszter preaches his pessimistic worldview to Valuska, who is too busy admiring the planets and all of the Lord’s magnificent handiwork to ever listen.

Each of the two constantly preaches to the other his own particular apprehension of life and the universe. Valuska believes in “the heavenly bodies orbiting overhead,” their “silent proof of the existence of an ineffable intellect,” while Eszter is convinced that mankind has “rambled aimlessly through the universe since time immemorial.” Valuska hopes that his friend Mr. Eszter, a man much more educated and intelligent than him, will some day come to comprehend the joys and ecstasies of a harmonious universe, with a well-meaning and benevolent Deity in charge. This is the vision by which the starry-eyed, good-hearted Valuska has lived his whole life, and the vision of which he will be wholly deprived by the hideous events of the night directly following upon his encounter with the whale.

Why does Eszter, who despises every other person in the town, so love and admire Valuska? Although he views Valuska as a “crazy wanderer on the highways of his own transparent galaxy, with its incorruptibility and universal, if embarrassing generosity of spirit,” Eszter concedes that he is “proof that, despite the highly corrosive forces of decadence in the present age, angels nevertheless did exist.” Eszter “loved him as a lonely lepidopterist might love a rare butterfly; he loved the harmless ethereal nature of Valuska’s imagined cosmos . . .” Eszter comes to realize that he needs to believe at least in the possibilities of angels on earth, that his only salvation lies in Valuska (lone companion in his isolation), since when he enters Eszter’s life, Valuska brings with him “a self-sacrificing, invisible, unshakeable, ever industrious, caring kind of benevolence.”

As for Eszter’s marriage to the martinet Tünde, this too is a fact of the plotline that simply cannot stand up to the issue of verisimilitude. We are presented with her incorrigibly vulgar and venal personality and then asked to believe that the highly intellectual and sensitive Eszter not only married her, but spent thirty years (30!) cohabiting with her. Not possible.

The Imbecility of Harmonics

For Part Two (not designated as such), which begins on p. 63, L.K. provides a title: “The Werckmeister Harmonies.” The allusion is to Andreas Werckmeister (1645-1706), German music theorist of the Baroque Era. I learn online (Wikipedia) that he described a system referred to as well temperament—now known as Werckmeister temperament—in which “all keys are playable, as in J.S. Bach’s later work The Well-Tempered Clavier.” A great lover of Bach—as is L.K., the author—Eszter the musician, since his withdrawal from the world at large, has spent much of his time playing Bach on the piano.

When he was young Eszter was convinced that music, “the omnipotent magic of harmony and echo, provided humanity’s only sure stay against the filth and squalor of the surrounding world.” Now his researches into tonality turn him against Werckmeister’s system, which suggests something like a world in which God’s harmonies are embodied in the best of the great composers.

Since I don’t have the necessary background in classical music theory I do not pretend to understand the specifics of Eszter’s rebellion against Werckmeister, but the text makes it clear that music, which once provided for him consolation and belief in some beatific universal force no longer does. He comes to the conclusion that “pure tuning was indeed a mirage and that there was no such thing as pure tone.” Furthermore, “through his passionate researches into tonality he had arrived at an unavoidable crisis of faith, where he had to ask himself whether that system of harmony to which all works of genius—with their clear and absolute authority—referred, and on which he, who could certainly not be accused of harbouring illusions, had based his hitherto unshaken convictions, existed at all.” In sum, “music was not the articulation of some better part of ourselves, or a reference to some notion of a better world, but a disguising of the fact of our irredeemable selves and the sorry state of the world, but no, not merely a disguising but a complete, twisted denial of such facts: it was a cure that did not work, a barbiturate that functioned as an opiate.”

Here is another critic’s take on the theme of musical tonalities in The Melancholy of Resistance:

“Ezster’s obsessive, tonal-mathematical studies into the inner workings of harmonics have led him to a devastating discovery: the seven-tone European scale operates at a departure from absolute purity of pitch. The works of Brahms, Beethoven and Mozart do not adumbrate some transcendent cosmological harmony, but are in fact, mathematically speaking, aberrations. In ‘natural’ (i.e. tonally equidistant) tuning the works of Bach are nothing but a horrible clamour; harmony is in fact an illusion concealing, in Bruckner’s famous words “that screaming that men call silence.” The masterworks that Eszter had regarded as evidence of the redeeming possibility of the unity of object and idea are in fact merely “evidences of human failings,” and this for Eszter has the profoundest of philosophical implications” (Review on Danny Byrne Blog online).

The disillusioned Eszter, now utterly mired in misanthropy, invents a form of self-torture. In a period of “revisionist tuning” he renders his Steinway completely out of tune and then plays Bach’s Well-Tempered Clavier in an “ear-splitting racket” for an hour each day. “As to the famous Prelude in E-flat Minor, the sound it made on this divinely tuned instrument reminded him of nothing so much as the scene at a village wedding, where guests heaved and retched and slipped off their chairs growing ever more drunk, and the fat, squint-eyed, heavily powdered bride, more drunk than any of the rest, emerged from one of the back rooms dreaming of the future . . .”

The bride here is emblematic of practically all of the personages who populate the pages of this novel. See also the cover illustration of the paperback, a detail from James Ensor’s painting, “The Entry of Christ into Brussels in 1889,” in which the figure of Christ in nowhere to be seen. The detail depicts what looks like a carnival scene, a coterie of grotesque, ugly human faces, some in masks, all apparently reveling in their baseness. Mrs. Eszter, one of the book’s main characters, could easily fit into this picture, given that she is consistently depicted as a fat and vulgar slut. Not a single person of grace and beauty is featured in the book, except for the angelic Valuska.

The Rampage

Nowhere is it made clear exactly how the rampage began, on the evening that Valuska beheld the whale. Did The Prince emerge with his factotum/translator and speak to the mob in Kossuth Square? We know for sure only that the director of the circus fired both Prince and factotum, then came out of the truck to inform the crowd that the show was over for the day. An episode late in the novel, describing the interrogation of one of the marauders on the day after the riot, hints that The Prince—accompanied by his translator—may have made an appearance against the explicit orders of the director, and may have incited the mob to violence. A few excerpts:

Lieutenant (interrogator): “Did The Prince tell you to shoot yourselves in the head if the rebellion was put down?”

Marauder: “The Prince never commands.”

Lieutenant: “When did you first see The Prince?”

Marauder: “I only saw his face once. They always wrap him in a fur coat when they bring him out of the truck for us.”

Lieutenant: “At what time did The Prince emerge from the truck yesterday? . . . Did you personally hear what he said?”

Marauder: “Only those who were standing close to him heard him.”

L: “Then how do you know what he said?”

M: “The general factotum understands him. He always interprets nice and loud.”

L: “What did he say yesterday evening, for example?”

M: “That toads like you are of no use to anyone.”

L: “He commanded you to ‘tear down everything’. Correct?”

M: “The Prince never commands.”

L: “He said, ‘Build a new world upon the ruins!’ Correct?

M: “You’re pretty well informed, redshank.”

L: ‘’Is The Prince some devil out of hell?”

M: “Oh, it’s not as simple as that. He’s flesh and blood, but his flesh and blood are different.”

Valuska twice loiters in amidst the mob on Kossuth Square, the first time when he goes to see the whale, the second time on the instructions of Mrs. Eszter, who tells him to find out what’s going on there and to report back to her. In his usual naïve and friendly manner he tries to strike up conversations with the men gathered there, but they gruffly rebuff him. Only one man responds to his overtures, and that man—so we are to discover later—is “the man in the gray broadcloth coat,” the same man we first met on the train in the prologue, the one who accosted Mrs. Plauf.

When the looting and pillaging, the burnings begin, Valuska seems to have escaped momentarily, but he never makes it back to report to Mrs. Eszter and the town officials, who are doing their best to deal with the situation. His first thought is to run to the house of Mr. Eszter, to warn or protect him, and there, outside of Eszter’s house, the mob overtakes him.

“Suddenly he heard footsteps, the sound of a hundred boot-clad feet approaching, tired, exhausted feet scraping the ground. A group of men stood before him and slowly encircled him. He saw their hands, their stumpy fingers, and would have liked to say something. But a voice behind them croaked, ‘Wait!’ and, without seeing his face, he recognized the grey broadcloth overcoat and knew immediately that the figure walking up to him through the open ring of men couldn’t be anyone else but the new friend he had made in the market square. ‘Don’t be afraid. You’re coming with us,’ the man whispered in his ear and put his arm about his shoulders.” As they march on, Valuska now with them, he looks up at the sky “and suddenly had the sensation that the sky was not where it was supposed to be; terrified, he looked up again and confirmed the fact that there was indeed nothing there, so he bowed his head and surrendered to the fur caps and boots, realizing that it was no use to search because what he sought was lost, swallowed up by this coming together of forces, of details, or this earth, this marching.”

So ends Chapter Five, with Valuska having been recruited by his new “friend”—one of the ringleaders of the mob, a man later described as “the most ruthless of them all.” This man saves Valuska from a certain death, but then forces him—for the first time in his life—to come down out of the clouds and face grim earthly realities, which, over the course of his time with the marauders, smash to smithereens all of his dreams of a harmonious cosmos.

In Chapter Six, parts of which can be a tough slog of a read, we are back with the POV of Eszter. Here we get five pages detailing the workings of his mind, his ratiocinations, as he nails boards up on his windows and contemplates—along with a plethora of other things—the arc of the swing of the hammer required to hit the nail on the head. This arc he cannot master—he keeps hitting his own fingers—because he is too firmly trapped in the language of ratiocination that whirls in circles in his mind. Most importantly in this chapter, Eszter comes to the realization that Valuska, his only friend, is a kind of guardian angel for him, someone who can redeem squalid humanity with his benevolence and generosity. His friend’s “steadfastness and love” are all that protects Eszter from a descent into utter pessimism and despondency.

Eszter resolves to live from that moment on only in the company of Valuska, this angelic, “wholly ethereal” presence, “wholly transformed into spirit and pure flight.” In an ironic juxtaposition of detail, it is precisely at the moment when Eszter comes to this realization that Valuska the angel is in the process of being divested of his angelic nature. The cruelest of the book’s many cruelties is Valuska’s loss of angelic innocence. His march with the marauders in the night leaves him “utterly blinded in the first shocking and decisive moment of his complete rebirth.” While he himself apparently commits no acts of violence, Valuska is forced to watch his companions wreak violence not only on objects—smashing everything in their purview, ripping up small trees by the roots, killing feral cats in their path—but also on the bodies on innocent persons: raping and murdering.

Caught up in the spirit of the moment, accompanied all the time by “the evil escort at his side,” Valuska comes face to face with the fact of his own beastly nature. The escort is “the man in the broadcloth coat,” who guides him relentlessly along, never releasing his grip on him, pouring on occasion more brandy down his throat. Valuska is forced to look at “his helplessness and sheer terror at the dilemma he faced when, on the one hand, he wished to defend the person being beaten and, on the other, to be the person administering the beating . . .” The most intelligent of all the characters in the book, Eszter had been trying for ages to bring Valuska down from out of the clouds: “Anyone who believes that the world is maintained through the grace of some force for good or beauty, dear friend, is doomed to early disillusion.” This, together with another assertion ten pages later—“chaos really was the natural condition of the world”—seems to be the overriding message of the whole novel.

The “evil escort” finally leaves Valuska alone in a smashed-up laundry room, leaning against a washing machine and contemplating the utter transmogrification of his world. Here, in what is, once again, a totally unbelievable plot development, Valuska picks up and reads a discarded notebook that one of his fellow marauders had left behind. How in the world do you have time to do your marauding—smash, rape, murder, burn—and, somehow simultaneously, write down your cri de coeur in a notebook? But never mind, let’s take a look at the thoughts of a quite literate marauder.

The Man in the Notebook

The notebook entry is written in a highly literate style, a style, in fact, that resembles the narrative style of the whole book. It is wholly unexpected, and improbable, to find the voice of the silent mob expressed in highly literate and intelligent words. It seems as if the narrative force behind the entire third-person voice of the book has chosen this representative to air out its grievances.

The overall voice of the book is, it appears, disgruntled and angry, thoroughly disgusted with the human race. At one point we are informed that Eszter “was a living demonstration of how the fixed ideas of the day [what day? what ideas?], in their short-sighted vanity, wanted to redefine every human institution, and were busy tearing apart the fabric of the town and indeed the whole country [Hungary?] (which fully deserved its fate) . . . all the fixed ideas, all those acts of short-sighted vanity, every judgmental train of thought that wanted to view ‘the world’ from its own limited viewpoint.” Mixed in with the citations above are Eszter’s only hope: that Valuska,  ‘the genius of the wide-eyed stare,’ can save him. But what about the other words: “which fully deserved its fate”? Why does the town and the whole country deserve to be smashed into bits or burned completely down, destroyed? I’ve read the whole book twice and I’m still not sure.

The notebook writer begins with a kind of justification of his (and the whole mob’s) behavior. Things, it seems, have come to such a pass that the only recourse is to tear the whole thing down and start over again. We, says the writer “had nothing left to lose, everything having become intolerable, unbearable,” as are “intolerable too the inexplicable ground-rules of human conduct.” The mob, “we were a single body with one single pair of eyes, ardent for one single act of destruction, one single fatal impulse, impervious to entreaty.” Note also that the marauder who is interrogated by the lieutenant the day after the riot, is utterly unrepentant as well. And he too is presented as a man of intelligence, like the writer of the notebook, not as some uncouth and nescient peasant brute. So, L.K. wishes us to be informed, it was not only the underclass marching along on that night of rage.

Much of the notebook entry describes the relentless pursuit by the mob of a man, woman and child, who have the misfortune to be out on the street at just the wrong time. This passage, describing how the rabble takes pleasure in the pursuit, in its knowledge that the victims cannot escape, in contemplating in advance the pleasure it will take in finally tracking down the prey and wreaking havoc upon the innocent creatures. This is perhaps the most hideous scene in a book permeated with hideousness. One detail captures the spirit of the whole rampage. The men have been murdering stray feral cats whom they come upon as they march, and some of the marauders are described as having “dead cats slung over their shoulders.” I am reminded of the closing stanza in a poem by Osip Mandelstam, “The Violinist,” about the mad abandon of Dionysian frenzy:

Play your aorta-bursting orison,
With cat’s head in your mouth, off-tune,
Three fiends there were, and you’re the fourth one,
The last, berserker-fiend in bloom!

But note one big difference. Mandelstam’s frenetic violinist, as well as the revelers on the cover of L.K.’s book, are caught up in the carnival spirit, the joy of throwing off all restraints and going wild. The marauders of this novel, on the contrary, are never described as joyful, never reveling in mad abandon. They march along silently and dolefully, and their pursuit of havoc seems to make them even more morose.

Valuska seems to find in reading this brief narrative in the notebook something like a confirmation that his joining the marauders had been the proper thing to do. At least this feeling—I did the right thing; I’ve learned what life really is—hovers somewhere over the guilt and horror inspired by his midnight march with the mob. Another chapter ends on p. 246, with the final appearance of Valuska. Implicated as one of the marauders, his name on a list of those to be apprehended by the military forces called out to protect the town, Valuska quite likely is to be hanged if caught. He makes his way cautiously out of town, followed by the two sons of the police chief, ancillary characters who play no role in the action of the novel, and would best have been edited out of the book.

Later, in a scene off stage, Valuska is ushered out of the novel and into the local looney bin. Now deprived of his visions of the harmonious planets and a benevolent God, unable to live with the revelations about what life really is, he is a broken man. In his film based on the novel Béla Tarr does not have the temerity to show Valuska’s realization of his own beastliness, as does L.K., but he does realize that this is the most interesting character in the book and he structures his whole motion picture around him. He gives to Valuska the penultimate, most moving scene in the film, showing the character visited by Eszter in the psychiatric ward, sitting unmoving, un-listening, utterly silent on a bed, his starry-eyed stare dimmed forever.

Conclusion

A central tenet in the book’s improbable plot is that Mrs. Eszter expects her feckless husband to “take his place at the head of some campaign for moral rearmament.” Her project, apparently titled “A Tidy Yard, An Orderly House,” proceeds full-bore immediately after the episode of the whale and the rampage. By this point the army has been called in to quell the civil disturbance. The colonel in charge works closely with the town’s de facto leader, Mrs. Eszter, to restore order and civility. She finds herself in a position of such power that she no longer has need of her husband at all. She makes a bold move back into his house, where he meekly submits to her power, relegated to a back room, where he can read his books and play Bach’s Prelude in B Major on his piano. Meanwhile, it so turns out that Mrs. Plauf, learning that her son Valuska had been marching with the marauders, ventured out of her home in the midst of the rampage and was killed.

The final section of the novel, titled Sermo Super Sepulchrum (An Oration over a Grave), describes the apotheosis of vulgarity in the person of Mrs. Eszter. Now fully in a position to control the whole town, she enjoys her victory over Mrs. Plauf and the bourgeoisie by feasting on canned cherries in rum—appropriated from the cupboards of the deceased Mrs. Plauf. For decades, we are told, Mrs. Eszter has had to cope with “a pitiable gathering of lily-livered cowards,” including the chief of police, a character who does nothing throughout his appearances in the book but stagger around drunk. The biggest realist and cynic in the novel, Mrs. Eszter avers that the leaders and bourgeois citizens of this strange town, who “chose saccharine illusions over reality,” had never come to the realization that “life was a war where there were winners and losers.”

The town’s “general lack of discipline,” reports Mrs. Eszter, its “state of anarchy,” made it ripe and ready for the onslaught of hooliganism. After the interrogations held in the town hall, Mrs. Eszter and the colonel “talked a little about the state of the nation,” which was WHAT, for God’s sake? The reader—or at least this reader, me—is puzzled from the very beginning of the book about the malaise that has fallen over the whole town, and, it appears, over the whole country (and the universe?). What has happened to bring things to such a pass in the world of this novel’s pages? There are hints in descriptions of the rampaging marauders that they have a righteous cause, that they are engaged not in the joy of mindless rioting, but in a kind of dutiful, silent, unpleasant but necessary activity. They are desperate enough to believe that everything is so hopeless and rotten that they are justified in tearing it all down, even murdering innocent children. But what brought them to such a state of desperation? That question is never answered.

After the town has been ripped apart, devastated, after the pillaging, raping and murdering have we come to a better place? Hardly. There is no indication that the spirit of the municipality has been purged or cleansed. We have, rather, the martinet Mrs. Eszter in control, she who now falls “in love,” who engages in gargantuan bouts of copulation with the colonel. So, in this book teeming with cynicism, we get, for a few ironic pages, the cynical love story of Tünde and Peter.

Under the guidance of Mrs. Eszter the town has become rejuvenated, regimented, full of industrious people out tidying up the mess of frozen trash all over their gardens and streets. What kept them from doing this earlier? Mrs. Eszter believes—and this indeed is the belief that saturates the entire narrative of the book—that one should never “‘yield’ to illusions, such as ‘people meant well or that there was a benevolent God or some kind of force for good in charge of human affairs.’” Actually, this belief is the one thing that she has in common with her husband.

So it turns out, the final section of the book features two more appearances of the hideous “man in the broadcloth coat.” In a turn of ironic plotting Mrs. Plauf—when she ventures out onto the streets to retrieve her son from the marauders—meets her fate in the person of her old acquaintance, the man in the coat, who, so we are told, has a bit of perverse fun with her before killing her. He “‘dedicated’ five minutes of his precious time to ‘amusing himself with her’ in the lowest way possible before ‘silencing’ her.” The coat man shows up one last time, described as trying to trade coats with one of the locals in the riots, in an apparent attempt—successful it seems—to evade responsibility for Mrs. Plauf’s murder and to escape the town.

The title of the final section alludes to a speech that Mrs. Eszter makes over the grave of a person who is depicted as the quintessence of victimhood for the whole town, Mrs. Plauf. After this speech comes perhaps the most sui generis ending to a novel that I’ve ever read: a description of how “the mechanized workers of decay” reduce a human body (Mrs. Plauf’s) to slime and dust: “a redistribution of atoms in the cosmos.” As one reviewer writes, “maggots take over the narrative in the final passage.” Here we have five pages written as if by a pathologist, in the language of a medical textbook. A sample:

“Now the attack was concentrated on the albuminous matter of the muscles, culminating in an irresistibly one-sided dissimulatory exchange of material; the adenozintriphosphatase enzymes continued their assault on the central fortress of the general energy level, the ATP, and this resulted in the energy of the torn cell tissue, whose position was quite indefensible, being linked to the breakdown of actomyosin related to the ATP, which inevitably led to the contraction of the muscles. At the same time the continuously dissolving and naturally shrinking adenozintriphosphate could not be replenished by either a source of oxidization or glycolysis, and owing to a complete lack of resynthesis, the whole apparatus began to ebb, so that finally, with the concurrent support of the accumulated lactic acid, the contraction of the muscles was succeeded by rigor mortis. This in turn became subject to the law of gravity, and the blood gathered at the deepest points of the weird system, which, having been the main target of the offensive—at least until the final annihilating defeat—now faced a two-pronged assault on its fibrin content. The fibrinogen that in the first stages of the assault, even before the ceasefire, had been circulating in fluid form through the cardiovascular system, now lost two pairs of peptides from its activated thrombin, and the fibrin molecules that formed everywhere as a result combined to form a highly resistant suspension composed of chains. None of this lasted long though because following the outbreak of anoxia associated with death, the plasminogens that had been activated into plasmin broke down the fibrin chains into polypeptides . . .” etc., etc., etc.

On and on this goes until the final page when “nothing remained and yet not one atom had been lost,” and “the realm that existed once—once and once only—had disappeared for ever, ground into infinitesimal pieces by the endless momentum of chaos within which crystals of order survived, the chaos that consisted of an indifferent and unstoppable traffic between things . . .” The translator George Szirtes has stated in an interview that it took him about six years to translate this novel into English. You wonder how many hours/days/weeks went into just the rendering of the final five pages.

So, almost as if taking perverse pleasure in the inevitable decomposition of this human body, and all human bodies, the omniscient narrator concludes his account of the utter hopeless state of human existence. James Wood (in his New Yorker review) has called this book “a comedy of apocalypse,” but only one with a warped sense of humor could find much comedy in The Melancholy of Resistance. Blurbers have sometimes compared L.K.’s works to those of Nikolai Gogol, in particular his Dead Souls, but I see little here in common with Gogol, whose best works are undergirded with a light comic touch and who never wrote anything anywhere near as dark as The Melancholy of Resistance.  

L.K. has admitted to being influenced by Kafka. I am reminded of what Kafka once said about reading books: “I think that we ought to read only the kind of books that wound and stab us . . . we need the books that affect us like a disaster, that grieve us deeply, like the death of someone we loved more than ourselves, like being banished into forests far from everyone, like a suicide. A book must be the axe for the frozen sea inside us. That is my belief.” The Melancholy of Resistance is not for tender souls. Probably the most pessimistic work of fiction that I’ve ever read, this book hits you upside the head with a sledgehammer and says, Take that, petty-bourgeois sap!